Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT API with real Captive Portals and Linux Client: End-to-End demo

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00313120118 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjIzy-33aEeT for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA60B120112 for <Captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id p59so175821edp.7 for <Captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FThGCBYss4YgljSudCcLziwFK+F+U08/9XY/5zCAsyY=; b=HFfc9B9FsZ/+zWsUo2joF7Ui4KOOnuL1SmETgCGwCm79XKIldZLRFyxtetBcARGabp vKYJgVg18njLzQqOpT4/XwO4ZgtNSdgdBtZAEiYcz1wYFnDFT6QUALep55n3uIm03vI2 IEtOBb8SeqWCDaqfZiDMl7ME05OtdJUI+N2BFYdvm3T79oITO5eEyDutd2fOvYKtt6oC 2Ht4xwX1cJu0LSCrZ5tun2+GlwzQ8F+SYOQJnkT+++ocGMe4uZ5RPOpl72jVKou1fqgq n7o3MYy8u9zvqRqo2YSsNJa24BzClfzmlX19qsWVLmhpq2RNVOpFFeb+jNUXmzKtOAxt Py5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FThGCBYss4YgljSudCcLziwFK+F+U08/9XY/5zCAsyY=; b=JQaTLLzC+bdeZfkSJ1RZbbiEIYnux3zq2FwDUHA8/g8b3jorhbjcRNC1GVe+7dHCh5 0eN/5R2ROeuG+UFU8gnJO/PL3ZMTdpqC48hKlss/9m2GjWr4NgzNdWxgC5uqN6HqnT5J nZBbpvapavMpiIrYvSKrnpOFp7yenxUCu38l+cNh3ZvzcuV2ll399ixQfDb10l1cPEwe ONxz5nLntJG5AaiKw/jxqUiSIJBwiiV9dMjn/abydEKxrN2cXKeWlDWxVo+wVZA6vIHr MYDLaVXMB7wllGcM9CtpwSJ8z+AUtlrVNml5y3U+NN6WrDUkSqp46jBXRZI9EDOemHsg uALQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7sSu3m0ktFJxgcwuSwgfcvdLxkrDE/oYkowA0Plc+EuvrnawO n51bdy8Vp1po8Cc4bdB7lulAb6SiL4JAzG0Bwbk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2hzqIxh2+hg8Y54Sc0VJ98o9LNBZGicePOA338F/ZZMdMj3UGNZu4GX+TfsF+V2jBX67/x3sC21QIBFcz+rw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13c5:: with SMTP id a5mr28066235edx.106.1572389244466; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKMty=+y50jOiGpH8g_LcCcO3uKbqJNoVQUoErVP02rbcap8LA@mail.gmail.com> <3353.1571337963@dooku.sandelman.ca> <75542360-43B9-4B0B-BBA8-98EAE8D9C2A5@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <75542360-43B9-4B0B-BBA8-98EAE8D9C2A5@apple.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:47:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMGpriVQPo_s7cAkOM6fys0qE48z3B-5QA1gY3QGna8iLB4tow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Heng Liu <liucougar=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Captive-portals@ietf.org, Anurag Chakravarti <anuragc@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d7aea05961466ce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/0K5192PezdTAoOnyH0j97ayCC9c>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT API with real Captive Portals and Linux Client: End-to-End demo
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:47:28 -0000

(let me try again with reply-all :-)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:42 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> +1 to doing this at the hackathon, ..., and then (especially if there are
> others who want to test as well), we can present the results to the WG.
>

Do folks think we should attempt to get an informal meeting slot, then?
(Like 103 in Bangkok, we have no official agenda slot.)