Re: [Captive-portals] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-api-07: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Mon, 08 June 2020 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569F83A0CB1; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-FKgtlwUm3k; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCCA3A0884; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id i25so4678960iog.0; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=opWe+SlcY3g/apFpNcaN22QV3fx4HNRoyw/lZ4Ad+gc=; b=HgojI9kB4ib7hJLpCSf24mQhwFKvg4b/hchyXRTzdPXXdOOV0jBS6tbHcU7pbT3Quo Quti4v+e7mh9M+BdDkdRGN7m+/BO6azt51VAcWzE8r4UfSXyOAuMsMvU9TB+xotSdk7G dLlukPJJP7F+MKHpv7H4XSGNsbNo0RZsF0bYCxNhD/KsV+4yjqJvcdB4feiiFSOoK3ry TYrhBRVoEUNtQIVueJ5ShMiKmDPXOCYlEbBUngEU/3XQ/3toi8g6s7/rjT6eG6fj8J/C B7+O6kEsmRH7lunjSKgGDwpdtgi7eF3OG90UcTGrSXlx0X7yeo1bJxTcTAeg/GwTyIE9 z7sw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=opWe+SlcY3g/apFpNcaN22QV3fx4HNRoyw/lZ4Ad+gc=; b=isfP8Dgx8a4GhDH44yjBJkITRJXaF4kImRe0XExWAXFc2zhaPlBLQIQo1akP3cxi4a mRu2O3hDLFwN9+305awb8mkJCYzgcJkcFXbbMFgQfACQqvxqXDLLDHOdnOdD6AaEiSYN KwftIk4H+79bCB0RGKH4w/ijjag4XXTY/NOqm/sfTtjGS/9FVFhh6mbuDU9ck2KL7prE s/xPGVNToOARdMtdAkcwN4E7pBQaNutiYoBbFupK3UtRuH0Emlz6YHB4hpzj2g+XF2rG CwvdDFXhWdQ26efx51i06daM4pg3v7qDcER3uXAW1yNMkb6dwukb2Q7/e1aM3PhILY54 KisA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531m8wCMlDjrn/upU2+iAi/86ymEWLvMhb/QPSUtnMS/bSNBCf4Y 4nhJMtlHotV3+q7yajf6E+zRpk6bY1+XsKvCDnInpusN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7fRauzFWfJFGSJpcttsEU4fOUxJ8GkS/UAZHJWgdhxGzH1OlS2nttUAmDsHCCjypFq6mX5s4yMwfFZpgrAiI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e311:: with SMTP id u17mr22497453ioc.51.1591633211951; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159162892021.27300.417000505596920914@ietfa.amsl.com> <14505C26-96B4-45DA-9A02-88461017D908@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <14505C26-96B4-45DA-9A02-88461017D908@apple.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:20:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxScYTLxdG3ivENqRcUw-yMGQA3-Qg=hi0JN+QEHvt_9Kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-capport-api@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals <captive-portals@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000360e3505a794fce0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/0w48wQ6oTqi0stYpPU0VBUwV0uY>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-api-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 16:20:15 -0000

Thanks!

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 8:50 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Thanks for the updated review. I’ve incorporated these comments in our
> GitHub:
>
>
> https://github.com/capport-wg/api/commit/daeba897a1d50229b86f6ec23a026aaa725bf672
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
> On Jun 8, 2020, at 8:08 AM, Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-capport-api-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-api/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This document is clearly written. Thanks.
>
> I am also confused by this sentence at the end of section 4.1 about failed
> authentication: “It may still be possible for the user to access the
> network by
> being redirected to a web portal.”
>
> I suggest “...access the network by redirecting a clear text webpage to a
> web
> portal.”  I was a bit confused by the original wording.
>
> As I said in the architecture review, the term for the user portal keeps
> changing. Over there it’s called a “Captive Portal Server” and a “web
> portal
> server”. Here it’s a “user-portal.” The authors of the two docs should get
> together and agree on a term.
>
> One nit:
> s/extenal/external
>
>
>
>
>