Re: [Captive-portals] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 08 June 2020 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D34E3A0DB4; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIb6Wcqtu0KX; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82CE33A0CFB; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id l10so7572289vsr.10; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fC+/h/CnYrAVnPALL6vo2/lD04amA75zzs347MhiTlg=; b=chlNCKw4FPOxII9jX3hQcYYlM/tiEbHXxBfO10CmKurWPFqiD4BbK+UZ9wN4ELcpMy u8FZuyTuY0OzkJG69E6uf3+RJyYvcnyWa3XRjGKOi29OyFb2I4mNRW8aFH2pjxyyM44L kV4diGq+dGgMoNMLHmsQ3hwbgvs/mOYrdFj7GkNxWLNg98S+/LTfUkwbFlfUbo1mBVt9 sGtVBhUypuIrTxNszpNtcg12CJ1RR1U/+V5RoWrz953K6/2zDczNWzaxYWflCqWTpfEF okdVJAS/VOjCBj6odxJpK8XmwxjdYGH3YG5JUXFP9B0i02EmfjS/WZujM7fjJSYb/hzf iJdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fC+/h/CnYrAVnPALL6vo2/lD04amA75zzs347MhiTlg=; b=A2WDONW2x9HQUcjUm81ffFQQ+hWFdiOw6X/wGYpo856gAMjstZNKbuSh0T9owIqiEo aEkehmL70rPj3H8doBJgpWD3kjda/JgLBfe3j+lxvS3oZYpTEME9LkfA65Dh2UUrg5uD Sb/DrwWfHNOZCdiHuFR8FYnrqHJf0ldgNp34LI+uTibx9Du8LqoovE8JGq7U7hjWfwLf aeeWbUmv/y3iF78oUqLviZuK82TRY3QuJcUik1A4WAqWW9zRunQJ0Gv6BGJdjhPjtUqP WI7FXOuCI9bl14IVjYrX+OcMEDeMwikYxuG8Lgw3vH2svrC8UyB8+ZHz0IeG1pzCeqhF QGrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533B3sdmJCoBH8jfG7G8kFkHZVnNkIiimE/oXABzAuOtXthmCCkM OJS4RuSxYkRX1aMRlw50FUIB9GG4o6zIe2DfcF14SQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1AvVWnkeQWEZoC+qIIPAbu5UAmCnAuybMbAgaM+VCXbC+eraujse3Lj2y+OZ/59Dly+QV+el/Rm2hPF0In9U=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:d304:: with SMTP id a4mr4625201vsj.7.1591635002776; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 09:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159150240125.28029.2671447454436388985@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACuvLgxsZvXM1U1Ye_8Y-0sxFMFFAHSk8jEdOEfzpXTjkYs5NA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACuvLgxsZvXM1U1Ye_8Y-0sxFMFFAHSk8jEdOEfzpXTjkYs5NA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:49:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYKLvKZFuBbi2w4pp20LdD=LPg=qbf11qEvcVR7Q0ON1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-capport-architecture@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals <captive-portals@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/8AGLV-Aa7sTfo8Hi80pzx4J-QRM>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 16:50:06 -0000

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:33 AM Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com> wrote:
> > Also curious is that "User Equipment" is defined in Section 2.1, but not
> > shortened to "UE" anywhere other than in Section 3.5.
> >
>
> We should be consistent throughout the document. If it aids
> readability, I have no problem changing it to UE. Do you think that
> would help?

Actually since there's only "UE" present in the one section, I would
simply expand it there so it matches the rest of the document.

> > In Section 4.1, what's an "RA"?
> >
> >
>
> Router Advertisement (rfc4861). This section is discussing workflows
> related to https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-02,
> which describes how router advertisements would be used in more
> detail.
>
> I suppose using the full term here would help clarify, though there is
> also an opportunity to reference rfc4861 -- I'm not sure whether
> that's necessary, since presumably someone seeking further
> clarification would read rfc7710bis, which references rfc4861. I'm
> happy to add the reference if you think it's necessary.

Either.  I just meant the acronym is introduced but not defined
anywhere.  Even saying "RA (Router Advertisement)" would be an
improvement, but a citation is also a great idea.

-MSK