[Captive-portals] BoF proposal: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 29 September 2020 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C03F3A0A1F for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bTLszZ8o; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=AnKkuJss
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfDIulFrYvjR for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373C33A0A0B for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10893; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1601382899; x=1602592499; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=YQZvHbI3N1bGXb8wM3DZ4phVEi9Z5LSXWl15crQ+ZIA=; b=bTLszZ8olGdHY5bJ8JQZv0W4V51MLMbFttc+wocfY8JhNf7Ucj8H6O5s xYOUEgQq4F9exgmv0YksyhSxFKrLIQM09pWr8tMOE0ugtfZpzK9oo9Zw1 SE+HXY1oY3OGydcX/UyujEXAMXqZby041gzTcy4oGuoD3LS3ByMs+gEI5 M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Esqe5hzPERhKBhnXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRWFt/RgkFGPWp/UuLpIiOvT5qbnX2FIoZOMq2sLf5EEURgZwd4XkAotDI/gawX7IffmYjZ8EJFEU1lorHC2LUYTH9zxNBXep3So5msUHRPyfQN+OuXyHNvUiMK6n+C/8pHeeUNGnj24NLhzNx6x6w7Ws5ob
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CYCACcKXNf/4ENJK1ggliBIy9RB3BZLyyEPYNGA41XlC+EboEuFIERA1ULAQEBDQEBIwoCBAEBhEsZghgCJTYHDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FXAyFdRYRHQEBNwERAUoCBDAnBAENJ4MEAYF+TQMuAQ6qBQKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFDBiCEAMGgTiCcoNpgkGEEhuBQT+BOAwQgh9sglwCgSoBEgFOgmozgi2QBQ+CaAE8hn+dDgqCZ4h7kVwDH4MNiX6UCJMJimuVIwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBWgEzZ3BwFWUBgj5QFwINV5E5hRSFQnQCNQIGAQkBAQMJfI1yAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,318,1596499200"; d="scan'208,217";a="570043283"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Sep 2020 12:34:58 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08TCYvjg003189 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:34:58 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:34:57 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:34:56 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:34:56 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dp18l3q5graWcIwt/YSzNeNI37eELQPmzFMjivzH8i2cNMJXFq+TUs7x104gf45QbBsDAan02Y2JxtEE0zeHHPxYo4AQQfiI3q0TnKWrBJqvj2j81+rnmso51BH3GtikSBy0xxMWJFGmUs2E58q3qwKHBcVMmOsd1gJeP+K1JDsBBF6cSbHLPtuL21I9WHKy5fNa5rpH/SCrSal/W/HB8fX4K7yVkOFQc8ggQ7iHiXG3HnnzwcGCDqIEWmmW7iwMTy0LaOtGXrlqCGuyPKAKPYbRE51k4YuffnNJ8UFuyyD6rqGYUyD254N51/uDuEtyO5ISHAR8Qhmzhq1KR8e1Lg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YQZvHbI3N1bGXb8wM3DZ4phVEi9Z5LSXWl15crQ+ZIA=; b=eKtdEvjx0yZ6oOpueogZCte8DVbnW4rgGUAv0hXgdBcG73yJNd6TVJlLh7FVa77dAlBrsipcKi7LCFPtQpsBPKCMh98J2Gw00sXbQKCf+t8HG3T2QissJTfp5YJft3Q1cK+Ev8XUgDyIdZyq6aNw8SKW5nqgJQcAnXQsY993Akf+YVzVIQVmwtJyVWGS+ROuwTHYjt3vory4JzWKGpE0cDZAnGCMQtaxhWFehxBsEdqOL4PD6fwsbZYVZo9TaCREDlScJqNmTNKYeLTS3Hxe1fIawWjH3P5BT3bTba1QqGLLrFMCz02Lad/Ryl2QzdYthZHf7nyPS8zdmElQA5f13w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YQZvHbI3N1bGXb8wM3DZ4phVEi9Z5LSXWl15crQ+ZIA=; b=AnKkuJssn2O4G3KsOtCexnjdS9n/17vldShFaUiizHKVz8ztEzfzV53mdRR3mC7UCC0N7lIfwm47TB9s7lBYVnHNK1lhHlyrDfHkmvNglgn5tYrlWq0fgsBZWnyAYZIcTfAOgPFB9HbtRDpqy7jsd9lDId13z28Ln9dmeXEeu84=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:103::20) by BN6PR11MB1843.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:fb::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.20; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:34:55 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7]) by BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d525:a81a:74e0:12e7%12]) with mapi id 15.20.3433.032; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:34:55 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, "Yiu_Lee@comcast.com" <Yiu_Lee@comcast.com>, "Jason.Weil@charter.com" <Jason.Weil@charter.com>
CC: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "martin.h.duke@gmail.com" <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: BoF proposal: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
Thread-Index: AQHWllzvuHaeR/7uD06XDDQQRIwzhg==
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:34:55 +0000
Message-ID: <8268A388-6A3E-4834-8398-A2353FFF642A@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.41.20091302
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:9142:f78b:7560:e82]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 72f614af-0067-4fd9-ed42-08d864741243
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB1843:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB1843B1A76E37FFD6BEDD02AFA9320@BN6PR11MB1843.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: PuggSqPPvyqJ4CX8p6Vuj1shUWVzIHvorJSDSbF9P4RgjkZBBcWbWqDt5iws8Tf+4ThDC9VPVBQUG+zzh7A5I8PmnAUl3y5enIBadXYYnu/W3BxFwjZkPrkqu2ulOb4roawzKx/Q2z7ZQIulJQxXbkiAGNJ4CWkZfsmOrS+xBhMuymcc+RKiYu/l4UniijYNWw7PWFt9zsyGW8ZtYUNyDoXIbt050pOX+QAEO9Zo33X351nqcAL40qB+jvkyIblgiIobob7JHAeE241Htsh4NkhtmtROr3uNw7DQTzfIDd5yi6Fg40Ixq7ybE/ROmMjvh25F4/1r5h8sSeRB3HvcN+xY8FPxH41JtRaS8ZR6KJKxSZCnMuQi55mamupMSaELyvGTXE3aQX2yBPaNOZJYC+0WcqIu7T59A9fJ++EWMKoLY7yVxWHEGifdG9KENCya7KUI5PGomW76ei/uN4czDA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(366004)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(2906002)(76116006)(91956017)(6512007)(36756003)(110136005)(33656002)(8936002)(54906003)(8676002)(66946007)(86362001)(166002)(186003)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(966005)(4326008)(478600001)(2616005)(316002)(6506007)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8268A3886A3E48348398A2353FFF642Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN6PR11MB1844.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 72f614af-0067-4fd9-ed42-08d864741243
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Sep 2020 12:34:55.6941 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: BIhMkjAjy2vpH5FwykTTz7IMWIULOUQv6/xqGamTFtjwqbxh4EMvKvNH/V6xXaPVux4h/yqS9X48HEQ9Wc08vw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB1843
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/CgLvmZ8_yCjDLRuhhdBPkSyMjDw>
Subject: [Captive-portals] BoF proposal: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:35:02 -0000

Jason, Jason, Yiu,



Based on the previous email thread, may I suggest a couple of items to improve the BoF proposal (wiki/agenda) ?

- I guess that there will be more than 50 people based on the initial reactions

- adding capport as conflict to be avoided for the BoF

- adding a link to draft-lee-randomized-macaddr-ps

- assuming that it is too early to form a WG, please state the status of ‘non WG forming’

- putting  the description & agenda on the wiki https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki before this Friday 2nd of October deadline

- starting to find a potential chair who is not a proponent

- Adding discussion about privacy impact on the agenda is important or even critical

- adding IEEE coordination is also important (could be handled before the potential BoF)



More specific to draft-lee-randomized-macaddr-ps-01, here are a couple of comments (mostly details):

  *   MAC addresses are not always 48 bits long
  *   MAC addresses are not always assigned by manufacturers (think VM)
  *   Suggest to distinguish between ‘stable’ and ‘static’ and ‘persistent’ MAC address
  *   Of course BCP 14 is no more RFC 2119 ;-)
  *   PS-04 is more a requirement than a problem statement



Hope this helps and happy to continue the discussion of course ;-)



-éric