Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT API with real Captive Portals and Linux Client: End-to-End demo

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A39912007A for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5I6wxz23wn7 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [17.171.2.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026F7120123 for <Captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9U2qL9e052960; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:26 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=sender : from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=3uchUe6iugewhfv5evORwqRusfGXsEOrlb/CfAjtyvw=; b=nMYEKibfj2Fb68da7eOgIYJYnoZCb0ZIicisGdV9KbR3i+1pGDELBEoPaevpoGfDOCuj mOzDkMp5rikHebtIqMMZR8+PYDNOcXuT1HbAcH49kzynKhHXBEQlV69ffl7p/cuNNlVu yZ0cxKEH34E840JyQl+NCS1NOl5kapexBvf2Yq2yEqjt5ZQMrR+5xPOkHf+JVYt70snm GV8mK4qFnDQ9LQ3y48R25Jk7P4MWblZkrqmRgf56gZBHrRnxpz6J5yFfK0DPBnIy0tgN /BdwiadjpY3wUIy8ndhHEVseOptFNSV3dJQDjny2glbwqQVhFwysWCFn0fR9Sg6kSdRz nA==
Received: from ma1-mtap-s01.corp.apple.com (ma1-mtap-s01.corp.apple.com [17.40.76.5]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp02.apple.com with ESMTP id 2vxwfhd76x-7 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:26 -0700
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com [17.128.115.204]) by ma1-mtap-s01.corp.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPS id <0Q0600KYX2XA5I70@ma1-mtap-s01.corp.apple.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com by nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) id <0Q06005002VHXH00@nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 43a1126a6581cd63d903173a70428f1a
X-Va-E-CD: f1a658c53ebc2a378b4d6f70d01eb78f
X-Va-R-CD: 981ed14068549747104d350915eba891
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 24287d7d-ef9d-43d6-b3bb-5d9f44b76242
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 4a1c230be26161ffb9b9eaaf466bf465
X-V-E-CD: f1a658c53ebc2a378b4d6f70d01eb78f
X-V-R-CD: 981ed14068549747104d350915eba891
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: a7c426b1-425a-4e82-b0e4-97d1002b8fd1
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-30_01:,, signatures=0
Received: from [17.234.108.238] by nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.4.20190507 64bit (built May 7 2019)) with ESMTPSA id <0Q06002AZ2W5T590@nwk-mmpp-sz12.apple.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <3AC2381B-CFE7-4818-B019-8244A629F4FD@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_13A4D28C-CCDB-40D6-809B-BCBC57DF5BD7"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.17\))
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:57:29 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAMGpriVQPo_s7cAkOM6fys0qE48z3B-5QA1gY3QGna8iLB4tow@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Captive-portals@ietf.org, Heng Liu <liucougar=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Anurag Chakravarti <anuragc@google.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAKMty=+y50jOiGpH8g_LcCcO3uKbqJNoVQUoErVP02rbcap8LA@mail.gmail.com> <3353.1571337963@dooku.sandelman.ca> <75542360-43B9-4B0B-BBA8-98EAE8D9C2A5@apple.com> <CAMGpriVQPo_s7cAkOM6fys0qE48z3B-5QA1gY3QGna8iLB4tow@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.17)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-10-30_01:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/EamVPMOm8k6oFtPqR2Gg__WguSo>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT API with real Captive Portals and Linux Client: End-to-End demo
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:58:32 -0000

Yes, I think having some time to talk about the documents, particularly in light of the experiments being run at IETF 106, would be useful.

Perhaps we could have a doodle poll for times?

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Oct 29, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> (let me try again with reply-all :-)
> 
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:42 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> +1 to doing this at the hackathon, ...., and then (especially if there are others who want to test as well), we can present the results to the WG.
> 
> Do folks think we should attempt to get an informal meeting slot, then?
> (Like 103 in Bangkok, we have no official agenda slot.) 
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> Captive-portals@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals