[Captive-portals] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Pretty straightforward.  Looking forward to the API document.

Some nits:

Although I see why you did it, the capitalization of the bullet list in Section
3.2 appears peculiar.

Also curious is that "User Equipment" is defined in Section 2.1, but not
shortened to "UE" anywhere other than in Section 3.5.

In Section 4.1, what's an "RA"?