Re: [Captive-portals] WGLC on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Sun, 08 March 2020 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CD93A1E1F for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43VRnq_VTLRM for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C62AB3A1E1C for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 16:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e18so6234465ljn.12 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:55:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8pFEHtj2ZKNrqRhqup0vxRWZYRKiHIWIf+YvpvKNQko=; b=bNZx/d4G67Q1H41wG++rpY2oGnb1izq8MGIyDKhRATUBYIo9cSk6DdnIqtJSooqATM JXqJW74fXGzl9YpLzsc8MfCOqE9SD0TrnEqWUk0LTWbfUoPo4hQpd5DRnZ3x8U+9NxSM qKe9Zyodg2qDXEIi5Hf7HNW4F8WQ58JvSkuwPUpxBMLHmr87d9+5km1LHtnUqqcWpL27 FX7jiewjHxpk2TIuyo8r23G/XSjyg+ElHbsR0rxFPfm2B0/rhTUvRDB9W4A9o502ghrw lG2yWce0bWLCzdMsUBrqGx4BhqNX1U939lan1iS+mgWb8e7X/iLarHUO4N9QiZLZZH6g JnUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8pFEHtj2ZKNrqRhqup0vxRWZYRKiHIWIf+YvpvKNQko=; b=XbsPoJbl4ACz3zKesMZLCljISvLTh49IUTZ95BDJB7C0JUNsxvmDk7lq/qb6Yde8J9 UTX7qGzj874Ij/BHjJVkg7pGtNOSfNUMJ7ZZ/xax0w5ium0H+5joWnOYhItJIRTjL9uQ Pmt1bO3Nz6nA8/q1Aw3/8kQPjy1GSEl799SPz7HdAQHYPvUnhb/wouZJyfEl7EJsPeNl hEM639MsxzJFk9C4lROz757ea70PirMuH3327u0fUuwGQcWiHB9lHj1U7X9oyVGFVquz hWfrDURV12Jf50scgHXbroM4xdSE4Sou+b2xIiQ10E5ykR3izF4/o335aI301nOJdQ9w R3Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0PLnA4LhdlITDC95c42kjihNx1rB45CmQlKTQmSe4CO8aqFjZx GUBxnzCg4UZpzE4i7vIOTmHdS6NX4c6glDOi9m989A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsgbEGZX2wtPS+NmRX9pEp9eUnillR5SqDyDF/l+mROduwUfBiopLYxh9lbuDGzrfQIOcshE2gL4bgxa7aliJQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a366:: with SMTP id i6mr4937222ljn.198.1583628935272; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 16:55:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3c073b65-53aa-443c-b2ae-a13064278a38@www.fastmail.com> <CACuvLgwxcUe4KEN8BX9V3f2Hpy-u6CU6YQ2Nj3wmm5-UG9jAJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACuvLgwxcUe4KEN8BX9V3f2Hpy-u6CU6YQ2Nj3wmm5-UG9jAJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 19:54:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ5CCeM-duuTTd6-y6q08GMFpOyqzR29LhYX=CbBAYbzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kyle Larose <kyle=40agilicus.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, captive-portals <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/HdGyHrlAHSNdvJ8h4ETBvZ0Ps74>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] WGLC on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 00:55:40 -0000

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 8:06 AM Kyle Larose
<kyle=40agilicus.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I support publication.
>
> I do have a couple of minor comments. Section 1 mentions a future protocol to be worked on by the IETF:
>
> "
>    It is anticipated that the IETF will work on a more fully featured protocol
>    at some point, to ease interaction with Captive Portals.
> "

Thank you -- I removed that text, and then reworded the reset of the
paragraph to flow better.

>
> Section 2 mentions the draft API document (draft-ietf-capport-api). Is this somewhat inconsistent with the statement rom section 1? That said, we haven't really started on a signalling protocol, or there may be other things we want to do, so this could be leaving the door open to future extensions, but it seems a little odd to me.
>

Yup, it did indeed -- fixed!

>
> I have a minor editorial comment about section 5:
>
> "
>    By handing out a URI using which is protected with
>    TLS, the captive portal operator can attempt to reassure the user
>    that the captive portal is not malicious.
> "
>
> s/using which is/using
> or
> s/using which is/which is

Thank you, I took this option, and have just published a new version.

W

>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 17:49, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> The editors of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01 believe it to be ready for publication.
>>
>> Please send comments on this before 2020-03-16.
>>
>> Comments supporting publication as-is are valued as much as comments highlighting issues.
>>
>> Note that Erik is an editor of this document, so he won't be assessing consensus.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Captive-portals mailing list
>> Captive-portals@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
>
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> Captive-portals@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf