IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] option 160 conflict

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 22 December 2019 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98D912008B for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:48:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6lc-X0TOM2E for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD6F120072 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id a6so11353296ili.9 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:48:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RWa0P28Zkla65qPpf31NCBsxfP/U+ZtN0WyKrOAAUIA=; b=mDed5qExNqqk0bui+oKoMUfISBdZP5LWlXy4AG/t30Z+Y5tiRVXmpoyaUmu2J1gn+c Gbel468PLYSfOIoAzs57ZIQUnTdZYI4IZJURQNpjLHecPrLCEqXfXTD0/yxPAV4Kh0hC mZhR1OtUZS17F9ssiXXYcjsPy9il+xaCCn0SEjT2DsBG9mX4RIQaHVPsJl6rYnLl3xTJ GkYM0wYn9ocPFlyS9Boe1yPTFHAGo+hP3scYRGUvET5fmpEIl0UqzW8YMBcrf9tz2pgH lw7NMCVeEHoHc+ffP5tr1g8hbUYkzGp7Oor/Dw0SrIqvrc4r45rjiRjWHUIwND1EjfTg wGAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RWa0P28Zkla65qPpf31NCBsxfP/U+ZtN0WyKrOAAUIA=; b=f5PS5TdHWbi4BKLtihWoQApNTP/Vcbu0Kw5/zjStHOaj33HqT4bMv1mIrHamnME9P4 Em5kZ3Pl/fSyWsdm3Ul1o3ciR1bj+XhXTO60ZLDiftt9AeOJJrZavyE705Pe85qkKSDt 3Yhr4nRcDIer8S4rONfVU1uPD/nVN5NiRCQ+tHEf9TX1dt2SlyzyglQXVzkaLZkUIb1F k32fN74ZxLXCN8frft/QwgGsAAncV3b1N/162mu4B64bTytiX29AusCnZDRvfyk9MKHQ QUQxIuy+XaEviAFcyqkksZE7bOQW7HeeCXE/UhOS6Lm58Ovario1Cr13TLmOJQGdo07o CSBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXU0a5dNwLNPaEjgop3xAvr5AzYBHkcqaBvzyWOs5T+knTJEB8 K77vusGbafFEveTRoQ4UMi3nHwGes4oCxpVYA9INRw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyUvr6aRP9mvWTireb5OCSj0W6Z4RCo6/r6CGjHCfNLTFoDhfZYT6Q0gxgTWKRK9Ya3t4KTWeSjiGMp+eYHxM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d30d:: with SMTP id x13mr21298642ila.170.1576986520201; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 19:48:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFU7BARZsgP_B+PvAdc1nKrypukBb1sJv8PU1Nq-vPipHG6h9w@mail.gmail.com> <30673.1574666680@dooku.sandelman.ca> <DM6PR11MB41370A13C93D12CA569A13D2CF450@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <15823.1574863018@dooku.sandelman.ca> <DM6PR11MB4137A09CC0527175C8F11EEDCF440@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <18576.1574927790@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CAHw9_iLOqTeY-zos50y_knwg4jtS4d608wDJatQF_XFLFwK8Wg@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB4137D61D3EC43B7133559509CF2D0@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAHw9_i+09y0D9AX9FXnym8fLHZsAnvBB2ef-43LWKiEoSY2P1Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB4137AEA878279A39A4C5E6BBCF2D0@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4137AEA878279A39A4C5E6BBCF2D0@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 12:48:28 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2yvqqw=APnyAb=gygR5KK6U7tcx3STGa9e6a8kJYO03w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005a9c0d059a42c934"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/NRXpm9YZJmeWxAUN7GG5gql3qho>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] option 160 conflict
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 03:48:43 -0000

On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, 07:53 Bernie Volz (volz), <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> 1) It would not really remove the overlap for a long while (until all of
> the clients that used the "old" 160 Capport option are upgraded). So,
> devices will still need to deal with it for a long while.
>

Do any clients or networks actually implement 160 to mean capport? I know
that iOS and Android, which seem most interested in this option, do not yet.

If they do not, the right thing to do would be to get a new option code,
and do so as soon as possible so the implementations that are being written
this year can immediately start using the new one.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email