Re: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 24 June 2020 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D36B3A0CC0; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFpZdxwovXRA; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr50086.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.5.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41893A0B7D; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 02:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ACL+0POWe/FZzpDQormyzMUvNRtUXPZMkREKdZnCnNnQ5uqP5wjkMnFjdG+Bns9T7kqdFuu9ub80KkwZBTwveKSXUh0potNBjTjcEVvJ0J3VbZs/BIrIUo1DQdk6bowaN67dpRhrLbQo9FfFVLIeGSZAMs5orOxiuf0+OXdMWZ1GW4/l1V/AbstwtMCmws0fpXdw+pgxwt1bEbHa74ufT5adp6walUyoZYL+kiVmiN4xEwTUd55WfKAlUM/2c0VRv5lweHg66EejOLmC8iI3BzYDSZE6VQrZrFrAjorYDoaaXZYoe0xhUKYZgIiKItA2BKAz0myNQqz50KKmpN6Yfg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RMq5HmJf4sJll41Xvm4cq8VZu1/XF6Lr1EqqF+AMuHg=; b=CYEcl+IJ4TViq581tjt66FKMFP1/VSh+QCdD41Et8xes64HzdaObkudmofAYM2Y1bUTWVBBGTBGceYaWORPkgir/FkYhnNQmPQ2+FOhvSphU8i5vEpfgIN/gk7a/qfNYXElmbq8Bd192q5r7rL1qTFb1FjhMKDkPfymfnhG9RT1uwcLBWDCmCoKARtRJ4vtupZBqw9VqQ/Fc9l/dIRYJ+ya9DbGUa5aVlPgAHOfsyGF7Zy/5K4PmgmOI0KJE1nnt0D23hEbCNzQnnFI6hsK1eTV493PLOVVU855B0UUs1aivFTjESIJ/dpOsCl1naNbBW/R7Xqowg4UOCNiifXVdbg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ericsson.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=ericsson.com; dkim=pass header.d=ericsson.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RMq5HmJf4sJll41Xvm4cq8VZu1/XF6Lr1EqqF+AMuHg=; b=ZTEi77VyX0cP8gvpqRI/PDvbzmdQsk5CylHGlVhofMpwk+Jn40fDAjAnvPUeGy/6vH2SmKwwG0psa8RwR5LKqjbKlkfOsLL+NZBrz3Nvx7Z2YpPY1YsAz29CSGrddXAio3BBBOQtBrPWMExZHmA8yaNSQ+HQRG95x8m/THGeUMA=
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:8e::14) by HE1PR0701MB3004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:3:4d::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.13; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:17:36 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::546c:3b3:9193:3351]) by HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::546c:3b3:9193:3351%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.018; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:17:36 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "capport-chairs@ietf.org" <capport-chairs@ietf.org>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org>, "mt@lowentropy.net" <mt@lowentropy.net>
Thread-Topic: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AQHWP/fnnU9PzvkarUOtgovqsjF9hajnjNUg
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:17:36 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0702MB37725DB501982D6F3FFC6F7995950@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159188369221.327.12745388214853797511@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159188369221.327.12745388214853797511@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ericsson.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ericsson.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [158.174.130.178]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 60c35784-2afd-482a-fe15-08d8181f6f3f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0701MB3004:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0701MB30049C2528506D3E56D8F03295950@HE1PR0701MB3004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0444EB1997
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: P6ngomeitbykIQeIpHGmvDJQ6V0QNYJdiTv7/iSroiHO0JdZj/fOhbu857vvQOg8B8qSwMIqd1GKLDxYJNjokXCpONdMGIbBAuusaXMJ12eq0ZXn284uWO++SDkCceQEgzzIws/nTPss0isL9oCbTxufi5dpU24sZGy+GgWqvJ9GsJOcaB3lPCB0ns+PdvMpDbOVZt4zqLUXc9KLkZ9uAgkkxiS3JW79bHjZirwnlWq2uBlVMIBdRZQxQDfuRBk7lHEFJVWueJYFbO+WBFDcA6rCU2BKXjAWrXVHMdvTGxuc8UaWfGFYSuutQe6Mc95gb+EQYva7v+ZF8jjb6ZgOvTkPapOXQS/D1L/sT/q+w3neTkd+PtZE7BdOVyb+YkaIlWk1MN9icTNwZKEn+LsviQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(54906003)(52536014)(86362001)(83380400001)(55016002)(8936002)(66556008)(33656002)(2906002)(76116006)(66616009)(66946007)(66476007)(71200400001)(64756008)(66446008)(26005)(44832011)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(110136005)(99936003)(966005)(9686003)(316002)(7696005)(186003)(4326008)(5660300002)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Kqf0/nU8m3ainNW2bdcI62Bz4L9w8rsANakI9M4GT0wRiGGU9CGf/yoJn0v6+J4vdqv+kEWxX9EA0QaHt5M0AxngApKi1Ni2KM5Yhx5USzXeqTte7/zK/cNPFkppYG/8IHEyyuE9tB0yvuqRoW+jHZe1FJsJpyS+TIo0oCTn5ZhiD8n6INDdPgFLuwqIFm+yEfnNW65znl5XxOW5iTvYYcP7+PMqnTYx1ek1KUcfapgSDpnBiqmK/FXBnVyf8zB96nh4alaHF5RJZRVzJhayGD/ebDLJBbLIQ5xCS7vnw2gVEhTeVodWxXnibjgcohPfBAiyJWEAT+UoWUpPP0QWGOulaySP+QNypyAkWbFLEnqQ8UJkJNSOmh7269dTZSCdnejyxT9LDA5puNdLQrl8ior9uH71jSF8Sh2uPlg2fZ3rzUl9vJejYMillvkrcuDlvR+ZH1SrqSy5QM/XOKxrNhKQ2bnchGMYjDxOB2NW/j0IptN4Tgh3ThgR/aOZyoH3
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012E_01D64A19.0F45D180"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 60c35784-2afd-482a-fe15-08d8181f6f3f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jun 2020 09:17:36.1203 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: s6W00X/WImBn3h5foG45jEScLvnOc/w47FQ/mzfgXOBAraCa2geXd+EWKS3UDTjMuiIJ3UlqSp2ofazTIqOJuvJPwfQtgGzAO3th0jOtDV8=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0701MB3004
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/TP_E09pU1hpLyhcwhMU8oJVc_zw>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:17:42 -0000

Hi,

Looking at the new version I think there might been some errors made with the 
attempt to address my Discuss.

So in Section 4.1:
IANA Registry Reference:  RFC TBD (this document)

The registry indicated in this section was created by RFC3553, so I don't 
think the above line should have been changed.

So the new section 4.3 do address the main part of my discuss.

The updated meaning and reference for entry makes it clear the history for the 
future if anyone will consider to reuse this port.

So my discuss is resolved, but please revert the change in Section 4.1.

Cheers

Magnus



> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund via
> Datatracker
> Sent: den 11 juni 2020 15:55
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: capport-chairs@ietf.org; captive-portals@ietf.org; draft-ietf-capport-
> rfc7710bis@ietf.org; mt@lowentropy.net
> Subject: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07:
> (with DISCUSS)
>
> Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this 
> introductory
> paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> IANA Section:
>
> As this document is obsoleting RFC 7710 is the document that registered the
> options for DHCPv6 and RA. Why isn't this document updating the
> registrations to ensure that IANA has the current document as being owner
> of the codepoints?
>
> In addition when it comes to BOOTP options code 160. What you have in this
> document appear to potentially lead to another future assignment end up in
> trouble? Wouldn't reserved be better status for this codepoint?
>
>
>
>