IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] WGLC on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01

Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com> Sat, 07 March 2020 13:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kyle@agilicus.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521DD3A12CB for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 05:06:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=agilicus.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfcB7wehn1HX for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 05:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D993A12CC for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 05:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id u17so4785973iog.11 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 05:06:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agilicus.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+NofpGWQGiOUr3+IGD7RMDoEIBoa2X3/O20wGphIpNk=; b=nR7CrNTfKyuUdgn3MujBu1S9YtGL1wuZtylQ2hVTzorYMrUB4473MhxqMY/lVTG3Qu igc9yXWaIlaZ+XM8we7W637dJ0uRw5nveqP2FhLSudavQeRh7XQ/XOcJj/UQP937y/zN wDEf9H0hsrtkqlOjHvqVGRtnbLmaZcTU+0VirZgGX+BY8DUlJVRr+v7TyA1Wvu/BZzhb TphiHFq6o1i+ebq57V0u5DcVQHrecmRQ7+k3tTcmdIH+YeEpKWOt2cBft8EoUVlTfUZW n9omXMM+x+hW5eK9s+Wr11ZChaC61CoT79+WszaTH9ZqeijCZN9xYsjCsIh07EYTVxik 3TFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+NofpGWQGiOUr3+IGD7RMDoEIBoa2X3/O20wGphIpNk=; b=GVANytkyuEr2GGccqestnS2eVTm8hbe/u2QlLPTydNlfGSgDmARTHQSf+e/2mS3lMZ XFaS5LVR7SUL4GalmjM5omvE5y+ZGg8211joKpB3jL/tWQ8OgGLE6HzRz84VMMD5GFg4 qgCTtr+4RCGmikmcMFroEpe4HgD5odf0A0QAn6kW6r+0TIJxXJb31ZIpAc6bbpp8EOy0 kMI2XlpNIN9NQ3sJsuVYQJ7SK+ZLLiEq9RlaXvbYNbUShlA2Eny92qYtH5Jw2/xbluWu DrS2rH3Qb1MS6caGIwjqkT7D9HvcMJ0232wRC3OAHDO5za5chp13UGULBAYXhoTPwn0s 5vPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0Y/mgUJQlVBhCW5vW58jJP8E4BKLx/zC0JSBZ+NclHUn2/2KOs VbMMteyIe4iXMcV6bJkVkJp43faof+QHHbyVsc36RSSV4w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv0VHjaicGKeexiD5OfxsY0mijEPifNTZ0Os+q6zJ9FxJwu7I4VCp3lKArHcfeSqGB3QcwhCSgX+mZiQzYfDTs=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:7714:: with SMTP id g20mr325208jac.88.1583586397490; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 05:06:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3c073b65-53aa-443c-b2ae-a13064278a38@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3c073b65-53aa-443c-b2ae-a13064278a38@www.fastmail.com>
From: Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 08:06:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CACuvLgwxcUe4KEN8BX9V3f2Hpy-u6CU6YQ2Nj3wmm5-UG9jAJw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: captive-portals@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1a64305a0437028"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/XQnn45Aq4QJAiUNz552ZGCHa4Dc>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] WGLC on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:06:43 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:06:43 -0000

Hello,

I support publication.

I do have a couple of minor comments. Section 1 mentions a future protocol
to be worked on by the IETF:

"
   It is anticipated that the IETF will work on a more fully featured
protocol
   at some point, to ease interaction with Captive Portals.
"

Section 2 mentions the draft API document (draft-ietf-capport-api). Is this
somewhat inconsistent with the statement rom section 1? That said, we
haven't really started on a signalling protocol, or there may be other
things we want to do, so this could be leaving the door open to future
extensions, but it seems a little odd to me.


I have a minor editorial comment about section 5:

"
   By handing out a URI using which is protected with
   TLS, the captive portal operator can attempt to reassure the user
   that the captive portal is not malicious.
"

s/using which is/using
or
s/using which is/which is

On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 17:49, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The editors of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-01 believe it to be ready for
> publication.
>
> Please send comments on this before 2020-03-16.
>
> Comments supporting publication as-is are valued as much as comments
> highlighting issues.
>
> Note that Erik is an editor of this document, so he won't be assessing
> consensus.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Captive-portals mailing list
> Captive-portals@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email