Re: [Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)

Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com> Sat, 13 June 2020 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <kyle@agilicus.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA723A08EF for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=agilicus.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qu-WrojccPvp for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ACA33A08EC for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id g3so11265475ilq.10 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agilicus.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gAZ6XV79sD54kuY9K8OoX+bdOrHtVtrTIshn8UEKb14=; b=IdCuGcK0cJuo2S8sYWLrR2hjs+FcsP6a03eKmuWzL8o9Zqk+jmHiwFBANsx0dRdcAb 4NaZmPJD7l2QqGCZUUTPrx9Ai02pSC6vOjOD09r+p2dKXWNu8ua/YJdYTN37NcPYsmpc aMC73mnnlzpaCYOvGo97x7/gRfLFerfxoiXxA1dmvZguoipi8sILfbMwdqeQ3fe54oR6 2i8d0e/0P6zOw/XxYlGTmGAedUfNInJUAwb5tuOmUXiqaniRWWtSNhbhD3tsZSa/aCmd xF5rC2xCDEPWvS+5bgZOVv/EBKmov8fkdVAe7bdRIRxd2FUyoUfA4cMv5lHePwa+WPv0 Va5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gAZ6XV79sD54kuY9K8OoX+bdOrHtVtrTIshn8UEKb14=; b=svDK3pnqThbQVdhaaMHa6aER1S5ez8qFvZUT/fK23tu835up49nwAGC12UPdcIutkt Wwb3WEMXvBUL3OSG2ecgXzN5p2HknkgZyjQmhIYN31MLmM9mWngY1YCGYrVHozlc+7ep I4sSSCxHuA47B8nakI1522EkEOYVOxrNfzMK77fI/5zj440h8sFhv284jRQOu8aBSHnS S5nSGXdgyMS8OHAo3YeLxNMDzSh++/a4QBQv6Rw9NbLbyGk8CTIi2lcNANOxLffrSKzv e4WUY7cQ8UTvD/OO5gL6fzXMoe/4iXjExl3s7mohhLJ5eVBzEUyDbFIpLDjWE/fHmOYY qp8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hQhggXQoovWtUdi2PrPQiR1Xvr5s2DpqUEP5JqwvyZE+Zell+ BVPy7jnRsfpJqcG9iMgjy6aTDqcOzaWV8QyOHr/i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys745TNDT1GYmz9Iax9ViBkY0iv47WrI/hI+vCCZhPw6V8EyR9977xS9fM+ah5E3bcQIelyitnzVx4aQmQvgA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d112:: with SMTP id a18mr17372261ilb.3.1592054634273; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159186942925.8768.12106173865756863372@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159186942925.8768.12106173865756863372@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Kyle Larose <kyle@agilicus.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 09:23:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CACuvLgw=ZcX-6ZswTeo1MGVR5K3oNWG1bQYd0Moat+B4aJKRow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-capport-architecture@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals <captive-portals@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/Y0He0ocolTliDxnDQsDLw20Cayw>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:23:56 -0000

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the review. Responses inline.

On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 05:57, Robert Wilton via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: No Objection
>

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I found this document easy to read, but have a few comments.
>
> I support the 3rd bullet of Ben's discuss.
>
> I was surprised by the diagram in section 2.6, since it seems to imply that the
> Provisioning Service kicks everything off, but I would have expected the User
> equipment to initiate the flow, which is articulated in the first step of
> section 4.1.  Hence, I think that the diagram could be more clear if it also
> showed the initial request from the client (as per the first step in 4.1).

E.g. something like a "Join Network" request? I think that's
reasonable. It's possible that the URI flows to the User Equipment
unsolicited, but I don't think adding the request to the diagram
precludes that.

>
> Finally, I note that this document makes no mention of OAM considerations.
> Having some text covering these aspects would probably be beneficial.
>

I don't object to mentioning it, but I'm not sure it's within the
scope of the WG to expand much more beyond that. Perhaps one of the
chairs could comment?


>

Thanks!

Kyle