IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3731201E4; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vF-9XNxJHUtv; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:08:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2D01200B3; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:08:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id b18so2829756otp.0; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:08:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jxfCviWcmnxLfss+looIGDKRF2e1lRkacb9n0XZP0Bk=; b=Rgms4kBgZCmgGPF/ODxBd2ASCI+NGZl8071AkkPkQOgqOu7G8u3alGggIOS9LxanqD 1Gy681Otpaki2JwXorXP0OWXIPP1QBRF0oacpNGbkwEIt0EtvD+6ACIcOQqLSeqXN+hT U7p6FXQ/hD35Qw+Q+D6gFgjiV6Ny2t1TiDIYdgxl6F2LOgVWcJatHXvs8sDnpVYCIAK2 nMyyU9lOhiZ17BwNhUq13dUN3YRlrG2h2OxVeEN1SL+jwIDcspCq7o6zL7PF1BaKpWND EzMeMlFHFSk8SYfATLGWR9fJs6osEbd6FgkimnqXv/8dzR8SLBd1czcpBFg5sGEHaclD 5O8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jxfCviWcmnxLfss+looIGDKRF2e1lRkacb9n0XZP0Bk=; b=G0Y32mjM1K+SJFPYycjQYWQ10cVIMzbGn2KkZsE8ZU1HvHq7pevzuAjiBtRsBiRmnb LYTjYqDZkMva81gJ6J30KkKWK+acOXbek1h6KIAST9CqbP9IjUhxlZ2KNZ3NLsCsL64e 9660/LAWzgieRq2rexVI7+lKYx40/2hNiupPyKRwu5oPdEfX5zJrarVX07YElNHKmMzo eJOeFjoROXU3NSfkxctba5mAE8W0IVYjV8Evl9PRO945SgOKnDb/x9jjzmk5iNaMpe+x Hdlcrz58P4vory7vFHb0PwjmvW7Fzd7XGe/uAyqZSCZtKHoSehzLWem38o2n95vgm3Gx AgCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpcMaf7M71Whux3l3ZNZDcgsZnXKmkUop+Rgyh9TpkyGX3gjbB O3rPb46HDEWj0Ot0OuiCMyCYqbpKSkqsq/pV0q40FQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznzxfiPVE+yPgzFawL4igv9wgfU4RIaqGAFQILL1HDtcJuYfM7i1b2HPZxh/uO8nsJq7tPqkeYMEHXm7+fpC8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:15d7:: with SMTP id j23mr24929823otr.357.1580926092474; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:08:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iJK72xjkhVnc71B40HC715ECpda-XL5dimZ_0r+dMe8CA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJK72xjkhVnc71B40HC715ECpda-XL5dimZ_0r+dMe8CA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:08:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriUdzvUVt743OQEDKaPoNp-Mh5AKboKQzTgGMUgce8vC1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Cc: captive-portals <captive-portals@ietf.org>, capport-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028878b059dd80a1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/bOYnDI1MKLfaPdp16MQ8RCyp7BI>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Requesting WGLC of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 18:08:15 -0000

Martin and I have a sync scheduled to talk about this (among other things).

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:18 PM Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> Dear CAPPORT Chairs,
>
> I believe that Captive-Portal Identification in DHCP / RA
> (draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis) has addressed all open comments, and
> would like to request working group last call for the document.
>
> Preemptively: I am not aware of any IPR which needs disclosure.
>
> W
>
> [ Note: I accidentally first sent this to capport@ - gah...]
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email