IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] AD review of draft-ietf-capport-architecture-07

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 11 May 2020 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D603A0CD3 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w653cKfuYqc3 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:55:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (mail-io1-f52.google.com [209.85.166.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666F73A0AFF for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id d7so10560078ioq.5 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gfDoikGE10HKkCocwPNxdmudlE5FaJrkPWqaGlsHpq8=; b=uFSPTUnXWh1gdUidgZRq6HIQ7bglN9PM5Yizn9tnQNxIMp9BX2bT4QALKFIEb0a1Sw y+lR/9SvXK/XTdW0+6wkHz0Mi41H4NqgXHQgLkdAJ8DxaiMCtqsLJovOfO3+2p1tgR7V XkdLac11ooqCe33gYg9PVWZdA56hyAvmqYoJdxyMxpN3nelqsyrTtdv9XPYnbGrz1aza 47UzrgvbyWXx9xXTOc/hVfG+v7HL4b00SFUykbZGZCLdglmYeplzhbOLJOb81wAkT10k pholFvKGICUIFHDhw/i6JsgBvsXjM2eos113u+tPp3BwqZKT8ayJeWqYQ3qSG2jf6kM8 o06Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYpCWKJlBOPiefeVyQr/B7pN6mF3AIgaz97Jc1bjlZ3yO0gW2RO R4yNaY2bMjCXJiccvaQHThDN6KimkvenHRndmShwEMDh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI0RfgNNHANBaHDE5TuYGctdu0GuUmdYo4F26pdkmK589o6jSHNPEMHR/GfIu2LKKLTUkRsA4377Bk64FtbD3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a1d8:: with SMTP id o24mr7012471jah.88.1589216156544; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+K1FZu5POa=TLz2-ON8=jvyE03gqdi+5+cNj8X4E9RoA@mail.gmail.com> <a4a3747ef330d8b2ac94a178ab691ca8@golden.net> <CALaySJLxqtqGAytEK3X083zg3hyXSOQ6FdnaTz5t1tDNS8tKeA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJ5Z2QpnVQ19ax+ChVNLSYk0yKhpk7uX4P5NiU-xcwJuA@mail.gmail.com> <14353.1589213763@localhost> <CALaySJJLfueapVTY4qOeoQc9s5aOK6mVWLi9VjOJwdHMFcHPjA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJL54+JUhKqh9J+UNKStb6fvyBmQRk6rCD2YFOsjEr93ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJL54+JUhKqh9J+UNKStb6fvyBmQRk6rCD2YFOsjEr93ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:55:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+vUAb4c1qFmL91ut4hGcCRU3cf=AZ73JaFTUKcSPZYGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: ddolson@acm.org, captive-portals@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/eJYWQRhgeDjYA8WYP3PuYVKdj2k>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] AD review of draft-ietf-capport-architecture-07
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:56:54 -0000

And, correction again: there is no telechat on 4 June, so it's 11 June.

Barry

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry, no... I missed the date: they would all be on the 4 June
> telechat.  The last call on the architecture doc won't be finished
> before 21 May.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:38 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's the plan.
> >
> > Barry
> >
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:16 PM Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> > >     > Martin, should I hold the telechat scheduling of the other two
> > >     > documents to make sure that architecture is on the same telechat as
> > >     > they are, so the IESG is reviewing them all together?  I think that's
> > >     > best, but can be convinced not to have the others wait.
> > >
> > > So you want to have:
> > > 1) API
> > > 2) architecture
> > > 3) rfc7710bis
> > >
> > > all on the 2020-05-21 telechat?
> > > That would be awesome!
> > >
> > > --
> > > ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
> > > ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
> > > ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
> > >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email