[Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietf.org
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93913A17C9; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-capport-architecture@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, mt@lowentropy.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159186942925.8768.12106173865756863372@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:57:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/iqt2bErDsgFvPzEXjqRC8mGqBsw>
Subject: [Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:57:16 -0000

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-architecture-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I found this document easy to read, but have a few comments.

I support the 3rd bullet of Ben's discuss.

I was surprised by the diagram in section 2.6, since it seems to imply that the
Provisioning Service kicks everything off, but I would have expected the User
equipment to initiate the flow, which is articulated in the first step of
section 4.1.  Hence, I think that the diagram could be more clear if it also
showed the initial request from the client (as per the first step in 4.1).

Finally, I note that this document makes no mention of OAM considerations. 
Having some text covering these aspects would probably be beneficial.