IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Requirements for "captive portal closed" notifications

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 20 March 2018 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFFF127601 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G9y8wCFRVkkl for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com (mail-wr0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12821275FD for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z12so2289333wrg.4 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jy4x8p3facyo1caHlyHCp51rSpWP6bdxn5FX5U/clQU=; b=RTJMTxWu4HwsQKdGB7mSKmP0mj1sTd29HGB5wIVLVAn10JxSwriOLUdcEyWeHcakK4 LnZF7/91YKuzN/3n9TnNpZALK7m7Nvtp+QTLsbgntl3Ldk2Crx09KpN8VRMLaDqB2UJ/ QCaJcV7ieADuQkTogsOFVCT5Opjv1RDl1MPA41BoDASNeuL36o0YXwZRXQ04BAe6eFZ0 TkbreL3mYHDz/jtXC9KLlJyox5ao5zbhfSijppZAT0C5KBngMR6I+TDiies/o6yIJyn6 44mtTUw1R21odz772EKk0Mej1nUVu4hE3DOfNu/JoTOJotW6/naz9dQK7piCmhZ5FvMk v7pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jy4x8p3facyo1caHlyHCp51rSpWP6bdxn5FX5U/clQU=; b=kvxSKbjMaeo0TfxdPPRIbFAcIDclIB6ZmzwLb7d3pZ+/fM+CgZZ5P0TdPjV8iU+TVA 1KomQEtk0WE2+Xo0VtLqqeHf08aYDd3IoeTU4YVonWxeT9XjswkBEXfYSmynQjm6Ypd+ X3K8VkS+BQjjtIwLwssRW1LXKAq/xjE5c4BUYGzgQSimCePyBl8nuhX2Bh2Qes8b+kDy NVccwJHZ4qb6+iaJNFzwkaxfdKaSXgG56AsVTJw7iskqeQI0/acUojqyUHltiI/Irj4R toxjMlyKnteqRuTSOeHD/xekmN2B/vO84tSpvS+fdaHkleSYeJPMH3R0rIKnEvzOZdpe TYCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7G+VqfccqY1/E3oK7CQMsjxcgafrY5xyOjD37kZxKO8Ij7e4g/x s0IakZ7qxJxst+wHKyXDDzXfWpXzEwtkkiAEojgbrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvWwzjnY29CnTHdg/AGrlD5AzWOEsG+ujOmy2+GU+I7mnTWKz/RRll8WK1R9oDBrGtBVPdkpLLyRYSvdPbiva0=
X-Received: by 10.223.208.141 with SMTP id y13mr524997wrh.152.1521562331812; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.130.204 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 09:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADo9JyUWawp5FC8q=0KJMk8T4x-iyFjpj167UH_NPjT=b2Hn+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr3rP24jQ6sMpoXZ3pU02FmvwDNc9=w2oAh4bMWZmEtQ_A@mail.gmail.com> <CADo9JyXpW-rn81kwOkqx8+=iBMTWd+x1FoMm-YTCm+Efmb23gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0oDZQJQ1n899Vtm1VPwwV2ZaLZTJV19a35G6pHf0x1Dg@mail.gmail.com> <CADo9JyUWawp5FC8q=0KJMk8T4x-iyFjpj167UH_NPjT=b2Hn+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:11:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3wSvgfOVJSJq30bJYrfE+hDHdCTmzcju3KZ8W261Kd=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Bird <dbird@google.com>
Cc: captive-portals@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4f5e80a061c4b47b50567da56a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/jyyroznzXTp88vySEcdtBBHHdUE>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Requirements for "captive portal closed" notifications
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:12:22 -0000

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:07 PM, David Bird <dbird@google.com> wrote:
>
> My point was that there's no use in having that discussion, because we
>> know there are strong opinions on both sides and thus we're not likely to
>> get consensus.
>>
>
> My point is that you are the one *making* this a discussion not likely to
> get consensus by loading the question with statements like "you can reach
> facebook, but to reach CNN you need to upgrade to another service plan"
> ...  which isn't a problem with ICMP per se, rather how you don't like how
> some public access networks operate...
>

Sure. I could be wrong. If you think you can reach rough consensus, don't
let me stop you from trying.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email