[Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 11:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, mt@lowentropy.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159187544913.10196.5178182944898325555@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 04:37:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/kF9c8foIHURXm6sn4_52aXoOmzo>
Subject: [Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just one minor nit:

I would have preferred if the packet diagram for "IPv4 DHCP Option" looked a
lot more like the one in section 2.3 for "IPv6 RA", but perhaps there is a
reason why the v4 DHCP represents the URL as two separate fields.

Regards,
Rob

[Captive-portals] Robert Wilton's No Objection on… Robert Wilton via Datatracker