[Captive-portals] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: (with COMMENT)

[Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and comment!) points.

A few new notes on the -09:

Section 1.2 has a new instance of "Captive Network" that didn't get caught
up in the renaming of "Captive Network" to "Captive Portal"

Section 2.1

Maybe s/navigate the User Portal/navigate to the User Portal/?

Dave's suggested rewording
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/nMLJv4gzGjBQZN_5-TJyrfZZbkI/)
is correct but not parallel to how we discuss the DNS-ID case.
I'd recommend either rewording both cases or neither, but don't
have much of a stance on which is preferred.