Re: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 24 June 2020 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A00A3A1161 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScdwrkL-Al9e for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F9C3A119D for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id m26so2041996lfo.13 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eUOqmUNS10Dq3D7H71PdjoIDcAdHQl5IBmt3K36Ywf8=; b=OpZnH2PpUnax7IsIHhhLN6pVBF2GqWLTEmYB7c16VW3GS1MUuxn09MjcyyDC9FFM6/ bNab3KcfbKrSMBQQgQ86rOVW8B6rQ0hW+oNcm+pW7Im1PSk3nYa9pBdRmpvW3FUemiRP RqLJre3mCOQjvmzxMUK5HsvH1Chwm2JY4z6OzUTV84I31xyDW849tIX8c6MbLfuC10aS +ZdJeGRfnzdcY9uv9jTdvMxbfNm3e7DWTRz0X8xTompgMwTC94OPsLHRHx7VdsNSET5O YfGrE142RwSq3ZASkt6y22lHGtkIstp/XqbnIx6qs/queUC5ATndfMN9OCtx9L5rDwl0 DuHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eUOqmUNS10Dq3D7H71PdjoIDcAdHQl5IBmt3K36Ywf8=; b=D9uLNvXws2Ydb8J9oq7TsxdIfuV/ShGxnjFQcdDq1YXIIAmrcQGimDuSvXGfXqD1en XC4cCOYsGcXJ2J9mqLBlj2xBe8ewHM1wVWpdrpLFQLPCqq8ChGnT40DnvxOtyuhtE8fR nc0i2ZlX6/NqJAjFYUeKCrSWQPZWSdLgDhX5FLsSkvrJg79G7TuTBx01bwbpjrjEiINZ 0x0I/NkbZme+3HOQABjhDi5yWt2+9wSe2BuXMjWcMZgL4QWetrRV3gqjd8bs4ihYbp2X lj0R3s0vrEn0YY9Lat96ScmwO/Iu068MWHHFXo3sIYrYusJ5HsGWrdHJWhR7rxnBggDW Diaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325dhXM8R6CT8Z51H4bARMaJ/SVqloIj8TiYCZXHn5UcmKzIMUj riRlUXVsGEZM14Lo2yqyH+iEZOI0mVyBQLSn56HAVw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFuVxkyWvPI1oTyp2ko0ZeGhAbjg3hEJbI3GhN+xiE+LecNuFbduOPjTbMr83+S2T6GxX3lMnwPOwYbMf++XY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5548:: with SMTP id l8mr9236333lfk.188.1593034100100; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 14:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159188369221.327.12745388214853797511@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR0702MB37725DB501982D6F3FFC6F7995950@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB37725DB501982D6F3FFC6F7995950@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:27:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJWhN9LiHv91N=BRJm4EXNWnR0gE0PJhLzi+_WDWw=acg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Cc: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "capport-chairs@ietf.org" <capport-chairs@ietf.org>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org>, "mt@lowentropy.net" <mt@lowentropy.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a7011a05a8db27c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/w8vNZfI3DxqHUA7kPiYdgmLCu1w>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 21:28:24 -0000

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:17 AM Magnus Westerlund <
magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Looking at the new version I think there might been some errors made with
> the
> attempt to address my Discuss.
>
> So in Section 4.1:
> IANA Registry Reference:  RFC TBD (this document)
>
> The registry indicated in this section was created by RFC3553, so I don't
> think the above line should have been changed.
>
> So the new section 4.3 do address the main part of my discuss.
>
> The updated meaning and reference for entry makes it clear the history for
> the
> future if anyone will consider to reuse this port.
>
> So my discuss is resolved, but please revert the change in Section 4.1.
>

Whoops, you are right / I misunderstood the registry. Fixed, and new
version (-09) uploaded.

W



>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund via
> > Datatracker
> > Sent: den 11 juni 2020 15:55
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: capport-chairs@ietf.org; captive-portals@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-capport-
> > rfc7710bis@ietf.org; mt@lowentropy.net
> > Subject: Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07:
> > (with DISCUSS)
> >
> > Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory
> > paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > IANA Section:
> >
> > As this document is obsoleting RFC 7710 is the document that registered
> the
> > options for DHCPv6 and RA. Why isn't this document updating the
> > registrations to ensure that IANA has the current document as being owner
> > of the codepoints?
> >
> > In addition when it comes to BOOTP options code 160. What you have in
> this
> > document appear to potentially lead to another future assignment end up
> in
> > trouble? Wouldn't reserved be better status for this codepoint?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf