[Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietf.org
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AAA3A085D; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 06:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis@ietf.org, capport-chairs@ietf.org, captive-portals@ietf.org, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, mt@lowentropy.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <159188369221.327.12745388214853797511@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 06:54:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/wUVCna79CP3DiaQarIDtwBMtyZI>
Subject: [Captive-portals] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 13:54:52 -0000

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

IANA Section:

As this document is obsoleting RFC 7710 is the document that registered the
options for DHCPv6 and RA. Why isn't this document updating the registrations
to ensure that IANA has the current document as being owner of the codepoints?

In addition when it comes to BOOTP options code 160. What you have in this
document appear to potentially lead to another future assignment end up in
trouble? Wouldn't reserved be better status for this codepoint?