[Ietf-carddav] RFC2518 dependency (draft-daboo-carddav-02 review)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 27 May 2007 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org
Delivered-To: ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org (laweleka.osafoundation.org [204.152.186.98]) by leilani.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76F27F76D for <ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org>; Sun, 27 May 2007 09:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E12142212 for <ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org>; Sun, 27 May 2007 09:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new and clamav at osafoundation.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.483
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.483 tagged_above=-50 required=4 tests=[AWL=1.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from laweleka.osafoundation.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (laweleka.osafoundation.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08H+ziieHXBV for <ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org>; Sun, 27 May 2007 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by laweleka.osafoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36B15142201 for <ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org>; Sun, 27 May 2007 09:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 May 2007 16:45:41 -0000
Received: from p508FB0BF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.176.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 27 May 2007 18:45:41 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19DA9II2IxDfxSblXyjeUboCvuAppDKbp1VbEw2LA PK7QZR3zsUbFH2
Message-ID: <4659B5A7.5010601@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:45:27 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [Ietf-carddav] RFC2518 dependency (draft-daboo-carddav-02 review)
X-BeenThere: ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ietf-carddav.osafoundation.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-carddav>, <mailto:ietf-carddav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-carddav>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-carddav@osafoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-carddav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.osafoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-carddav>, <mailto:ietf-carddav-request@osafoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 16:46:42 -0000

Hi,

I have started to review the latest draft, but haven't finished yet. 
However, it seems that some points merit separate discussion threads 
anyway, so I'll start with one of those.

Right now, draft-daboo-carddav-02 has a normative dependence on RFC2518, 
and mentions RFC2518bis only informatively. Is this an oversight?

Here's what I'd propose:

- get rid of RFC2518 reference
- make RFC2518bis reference normative (update all references to RFC2518 
accordingly)
- require DAV class 3 support
- RFC3253 is cited for some things that have been updated by RFC2518bis, 
such as pre/postcondition definitions, DAV:error marshalling, and the 
definition of "protected property" -- please update those to refer to 
RFC2518bis (I guess the only RFC3253 dependencies should be on things 
related to the REPORT method).

Best regards, Julian