Re: [Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address-pool-management-arch

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF4E1297EC for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ensrhFIFdIlx for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4F11243FE for <casm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 190so24564483itm.0 for <casm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=52N1EpfvQlTJjRQXZf2N7d4HLuJG59aI8FIvPLtFags=; b=qjU+/IFAWlhvovl8wE6ladV0aPzo1+RUAXO84OseI0SUig0B+HfPGqPMngPHXUvY5v msWlHVBj5jQTuy9z930hcip2fsQTP9UktERWiSnhEqL1Bfs2x+/+9kuBk+JcGKbQe00K uOauJsSa1/nOvujNvztuVfZbx0AAsiW8WP8KlicHnDbsXMvjToNfjFyhlkwh5kNWJBpm lwZC+lHtfT2NvthRJTdNLkVnEoX4TExefLmDzd/f7YnYOi5r6tgC6yag0zRhPR39k+RD ezXhBX+a424vzEIGsYwDc07Clf0jdT4vCB0IYrQ2BVHuOoIzAy1pqUl8uTe8dWc9joXe FRXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=52N1EpfvQlTJjRQXZf2N7d4HLuJG59aI8FIvPLtFags=; b=jEEk8RbVl/5k98RwccosvhEfU7NZWW/xHSPg8vuT6mHpP5ELL6SHKuc1G1HFsHqqgX hfLSW3hxuNFHDMaSH5EV61zymJxsTByxRAt4Hm3C01WdAdgcLaCspAtdWBjZA5Q4NIPk ACPEL4P5BmnqvmZC5eRuXYOLJUnSc0L0vlZ3pCR5+Cz2wbIp3obn79fE1i7MlU70JI3z n/Kmwu7IfXSra9jOFAIJTjVvFRDeEeqUunyKOnerDM4qmzqrx17q81pZd+yyHJk6wf3z rJbehHBKfLWRGABA91seSvVa6Bpt5H9chxayOHJGKMqeeEXhloZoR1Uv8sGfJ+GVWuMG qBNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2syv5OPf2tTP+Eg78xkUykBZilr4Vp+kcP50tJp06Pn1qEjf1VSQLfUHFnUg1KMA==
X-Received: by 10.36.41.7 with SMTP id p7mr7791662itp.92.1490189908629; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.11.95] (50-76-68-137-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.76.68.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c91sm822564iod.18.2017.03.22.06.38.27 for <casm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 06:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: casm@ietf.org
References: <931DC0F0-4BB6-4217-BDAB-803AEA1DD726@viagenie.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <09446363-75c0-2aa9-f83d-0aacbde80e6a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 02:38:34 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <931DC0F0-4BB6-4217-BDAB-803AEA1DD726@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/casm/G3TKGlV7mBDHad_aAqBLpLnbEq0>
Subject: Re: [Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address-pool-management-arch
X-BeenThere: casm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Centralized Address Space Management <casm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/casm/>
List-Post: <mailto:casm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 13:38:41 -0000

Hi,
On 22/03/2017 08:09, Marc Blanchet wrote:
..
> - control protocol: I think we should look at the inverse way: i.e. 
> define the framework based on {net,rest}conf/yang, 

You don't even need to assume {net,rest}conf just because you assume
YANG. I think I can see the the draft YANG everything needed to direct
an autonomic solution.

> and then just handle 
> the legacy side (radius).

Yes, you have to assume that some of the agents will need legacy solutions
to manage legacy targets.

    Brian