[Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address-pool-management-arch
"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 21 March 2017 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9A9128ACA; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jD12EaOO3llw; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976A812778D; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.123.31.226] (h226.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.226]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BA2E47A07; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:09:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: draft-li-casm-address-pool-management-arch@ietf.org
Cc: "CASM@ietf.org" <CASM@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:09:31 -0400
Message-ID: <931DC0F0-4BB6-4217-BDAB-803AEA1DD726@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/casm/JJQbdJVesna4nQnorLi4Wxvub0E>
Subject: [Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address-pool-management-arch
X-BeenThere: casm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Centralized Address Space Management <casm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/casm/>
List-Post: <mailto:casm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:09:40 -0000
Hello,
read your document. few comments:
- abstracts talks about IPv4 address depletion, but the rest of the
document seems to be generic.
- IPv6 has the concept of prefix delegation up to inside the home, where
the home may have multiple prefixes. And some users may have different
prefix sizes depending on the « service level ». I don’t see this
case handled currently in the architecture. might be too high-level.
- draft discusses « AddressPoolRenew request » but this does not
seem to be specified.
- there were some discussions about « coordinated » instead of
« centralized » where it does not need to be centralized. this
document does not seem to address or look at the coordinated use case.
- control protocol: I think we should look at the inverse way: i.e.
define the framework based on {net,rest}conf/yang, and then just handle
the legacy side (radius).
Marc.
- [Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address-poo… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Casm] some comments on draft-li-casm-address… Brian E Carpenter