[Casm] Fwd: CASM BoF Preparation

"Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Thu, 02 March 2017 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FA9129989 for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:44:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id loxUmEhavr_3 for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101D912998F for <CASM@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 04:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [206.123.31.198] (h198.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.198]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D461476F5 for <CASM@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 07:44:35 -0500 (EST)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
To: "CASM@ietf.org" <CASM@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 07:44:35 -0500
Message-ID: <D1A084E5-A661-4CA5-9A4A-5403C549EDEE@viagenie.ca>
References: <b388be67-d9cd-bed6-b25d-3344e22c5434@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_0957FB2A-E3E1-4CA5-B333-646C31C76334_="
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/casm/Tq_pvCw2363-V6KK118SWr8LmJk>
Subject: [Casm] Fwd: CASM BoF Preparation
X-BeenThere: casm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Centralized Address Space Management <casm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/casm/>
List-Post: <mailto:casm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:44:38 -0000

I suggest we use Benoit email as the primary agenda of our call, and 
more specifically:

- Which interfaces does CASM plan on standardizing?
- What are the envisioned key deliverables?
- See Warren's email on "where is the border"?

Marc.
--- Begin Message ---
Dear all,

It's time to get organized for the CASM BoF.
Marc Blanchet and Ralph Droms accepted to facilitate the CASM BoF as 
chairs. Thanks to them.

We, OPS ADs, identified a couple of points that would require some more 
explanations IMO.
- Which interfaces does CASM plan on standardizing?
- What are the envisioned key deliverables?
- See Warren's email on "where is the border"?

There are surely some more, but that should get the discussion started.

The two CASM drafts are in their 00 release and are pretty light to be 
honest.
They would benefit from some updates.

A BoF is successful when the proponents are able to clearly explain 
their problem statement to the audience, to get the audience to agree 
that this is an important topic, and propose (a start of) a solution as 
a way forward.
RFC 5434 is a good read, from which I particularly like:

    In those cases, the goal of the
    BOF is to demonstrate that the community has agreement that:

           - there is a problem that needs solving, and the IETF is the right
             group to attempt solving it.

           - there is a critical mass of participants willing to work on the
             problem (e.g., write drafts, review drafts, etc.).

           - the scope of the problem is well defined and understood, that
             is, people generally understand what the WG will work on (and
             what it won't) and what its actual deliverables will be.

           - there is agreement that the specific deliverables (i.e.,
             proposed documents) are the right set.

           - it is believed that the WG has a reasonable probability of
             having success (i.e., in completing the deliverables in its
             charter in a timely fashion).


Regards, Benoit (OPS AD).


_______________________________________________
CASM mailing list
CASM@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm
--- End Message ---