Re: [Casm] Possible charter goals and milestones

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: casm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3784129447 for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kv0OTnV36FqY for <casm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1F012944B for <casm@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x66so16053237pfb.3 for <casm@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s04rZClLWsxAqaRl8B1vK4Yd1WKvvZfLCmpqEbync48=; b=dta6zXbrxvQqqrfHZojJsSgdLpEfytlH1UKbGha4kQZTIpA3oNxvUiq41jPF7eUd9V Iq0RvAn3q5bj6oBgRQXQEpASSluZD215GHa8eDhaAzNm6B2J0P9BDgBXdEVsGjASdlGS 1zHs1C/DGBgNvgVRJV7sXKmR0UdF5XbxPCeUwrlXYxWI+QJt/ZQzIInIZ3OA77jLAxO4 VZct0YjOYzpNuJ/QyuUwvkhJEgbLUHbs5igJDWXBx6dBVRiV5HqKjjsy7utqIVyJ43le w+Pxc9s+72ufHRO//Usm3nFipXP2Je/RtwCuR44LP8I1bxyjG6ZO7ZbgbYtcyImW/om3 Hq8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s04rZClLWsxAqaRl8B1vK4Yd1WKvvZfLCmpqEbync48=; b=Z1bYHdRzJMwDjzkOtURUskDwbV5PsMsm+S6eTi+m+9ZAWKBaR7NkOkl7Lufp5p1uBO CSf79OSgGNi5BdviCja9qRhmSKJ5Z98cru3Y5X8dnrBT4HkP0EK/ULkQ5gpB2TmTwTDY Hri3itGGQOz3Wgd20w8ONQj0yQbu25AZzDD9SCIsYzPSE5AcYk6XF8eI3PzqPW690eF1 aIinqUOXpeLR75XyRIQ+ovAxhFKnYKYmAHO7d9dOGgxpOmxrnD/poReN+TGkgpTr1T0N 5Lpf7JAGoJskNTtJlbJWs9sK26Z7I1GsMRUv+6Iwi9bT6j9gadd/nPYtnRApLmge6cnN q8fA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m9fI70jfGdLNIABsdeoRqcVzBPeM/EkdcrBrSTcoZbZOVhXTlBWOIPJ1lly9T/Dw==
X-Received: by 10.99.114.66 with SMTP id c2mr11908128pgn.4.1488415282968; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6663:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6663:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm12831924pgf.35.2017.03.01.16.41.21 for <casm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:41:22 -0800 (PST)
To: casm@ietf.org
References: <e3e3a854-f452-c176-1757-f0fcb94a5b2a@cisco.com> <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB898C37DB@SZXEMA509-MBS.china.huawei.com> <6150aca4-83ee-60cf-4b79-b657b8971040@cisco.com> <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB898C4AEA@SZXEMA509-MBS.china.huawei.com> <47128f6c-2dc8-400b-4521-a36dec4eb4e8@cisco.com> <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB898CF4FD@SZXEMA509-MBS.china.huawei.com> <201703020728125079505@chinatelecom.cn>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <32cb759e-abd3-f0d9-5fdc-b2dab32e0ce0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:41:25 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201703020728125079505@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/casm/zv4A-blaCibD64EmTG7AHQY1Ye8>
Subject: Re: [Casm] Possible charter goals and milestones
X-BeenThere: casm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Centralized Address Space Management <casm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/casm/>
List-Post: <mailto:casm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm>, <mailto:casm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:41:28 -0000

On 02/03/2017 12:28, Xie Chongfeng wrote:
> I think that the interaction between address management entity and network element needs to be defined, it is a kind of protocol, if my understanding is right.

That's exactly where the Anima solution could be applied, if you want something
that is automatic and has more distributed intelligence than CLI or Netconf.

    Brian

> 
> Chongfeng Xie
> 
> 
> 
> xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn
>  
> From: Liushucheng (Will Liu)
> Date: 2017-03-01 17:02
> To: Benoit Claise; CASM@ietf.org; Xie Chongfeng; Rakesh Kumar
> CC: 'Ying Cheng'; joelja@bogus.com; Marc Blanchet; warren@kumari.net
> Subject: RE: [Casm] Possible charter goals and milestones
> Hi Benoit,
>  
> Thanks for reply. This is a good question to help the group make the goal clearer. Chongfeng and Rakesh, please correct me if I misunderstood: 
> 1.      From the discussion on the list, we can see that Chongfeng answered this by referring to the data model draft.  
> 2.      However, the framework figure in Rakesh’s draft show a more broader scope including APIs. 
> 3.      Protocol? So far no new protocol or extensions have been raised. Or at least this is my understanding. J
> To get aligned we will discuss this topic at the upcoming online meeting. 
>  
> Regards,
> Will (Shucheng LIU)
>  
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 4:54 AM
> To: Liushucheng (Will Liu) <liushucheng@huawei.com>om>; CASM@ietf.org
> Cc: 'Ying Cheng' <chengying10@chinaunicom.cn>cn>; 'Xie Chongfeng' <xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn>cn>; 'Rakesh Kumar' <rkkumar@juniper.net>et>; joelja@bogus.com; Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>ca>; warren@kumari.net
> Subject: Re: [Casm] Possible charter goals and milestones
>  
> On 2/16/2017 3:45 PM, Liushucheng (Will) wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>  
> Please see below inline.
>  
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 9:25 PM
> To: Liushucheng (Will); CASM@ietf.org
> Cc: 'Ying Cheng'; 'Xie Chongfeng'; 'Rakesh Kumar'; joelja@bogus.com; Marc Blanchet; warren@kumari.net
> Subject: Re: [Casm] Possible charter goals and milestones
>  
> Hi Liushucheng,
> Hi Benoit and all,
>  
> Thanks for your guidance. After offline discussions among all the proponents, we changed the BoF to non-WG forming in the wiki.  https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/
>  
>  
> We also added the purpose of the BoF in the description:
> The purpose of the BoF is to gather a common set of requirements from a larger set of operators and, if needed, possible protocol work milestones and scope.
> Protocol work?  Which protocol?  Can you expand on what is needed?
> I thought the work was about interfaces.
> [Will] Thanks for the comments. As answered by Rakesh and Chongfeng, currently only interfaces are considered.
> OK, to make sure we speak the same language, what do you call an interface in this context?
>     - A protocol between A and B (with some negotiation, for example)? 
>     - A data model?  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sun-i2apm-address-pool-management-yang/ has been mentioned
>     - An API?
>     - etc.
> 
> Regards, Benoit
> 
>  
> Cheers,
> Will (Shucheng LIU)
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CASM mailing list
> CASM@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/casm
>