Thu, 16 April 1998 15:53 UTC
Received: from pad-thai.cam.ov.com by bitsy.MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA15885; Thu, 16 Apr 98 11:53:24 EDT
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by pad-thai.cam.ov.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) id KAA25896 for cat-ietf-redist; Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20140418005449.2560.26426.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Message-ID:
X-Date: (the original message had no date)
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 22:53:24 -0000
<6B5344C210C7D011835C0000F80127660121119D@exna01.securitydynamics.com> From: "Linn, John" <jlinn@securitydynamics.com> To: "'CAT-WG List'" <cat-ietf@mit.edu> Subject: CAT WG Last-Call: draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-cbind-05 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 10:20:08 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk CAT/GSSV2 fanciers: Given that we've now agreed the small number of changes to RFC2078bis which will render it sufficient to represent WG consensus for submission to the IESG, I believe that it would be useful if possible to be able to submit the C bindings as well as a combined package, targeting recommendation for a related pair of Proposed Standards. To this end, I'd like to open a WG Last-Call on draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-cbind-05, to extend through Friday, 1 May. Since the C bindings have evolved and become relatively stable over some time, and a significant proportion of the changes made to 2078bis were made for the purpose of alignment with the bindings document, it's my hope that this can be a smooth and straightforward process. Comments or discussion? --jl John Linn (linn@rsa.com) RSA Laboratories East, Bedford, MA, USA