Re: WG ACTION: TP/IX (tpix)

Robert L Ullmann <ULLMANN@process.com> Tue, 01 June 1993 13:41 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04161; 1 Jun 93 9:41 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04157; 1 Jun 93 9:41 EDT
Received: from world.std.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08914; 1 Jun 93 9:41 EDT
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA21658; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 09:27:08 -0400
Errors-To: tpix-request@world.std.com
X-Orig-Sender: tpix-request@world.std.com
Reply-To: tpix@world.std.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ULLMANN@PROCESS.COM>
Received: from hadar.process.com ([192.42.95.47]) by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA21647; Tue, 1 Jun 1993 09:27:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199306011327.AA21647@world.std.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1993 09:24 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Robert L Ullmann <ULLMANN@process.com>
To: tpix@world.std.com
Subject: Re: WG ACTION: TP/IX (tpix)

Hi,

> Date: Fri, 28 May 1993 10:31:05 PDT
> From: Steve Deering <deering@parc.xerox.com>

> Shouldn't that be IP Version number 7, not Protocol Identifier 7?  IP
> Protocol numbers identify transport protocols.

The IESG secretary has re-worded that section to make it clear(er)
which code set the assignment is in. The current charter is in the
archive directory.

Robert