Re: TTL Uses ???

Matt Crawford <crawdad@munin.fnal.gov> Fri, 14 January 1994 20:48 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13702; 14 Jan 94 15:48 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13698; 14 Jan 94 15:47 EST
Received: from world.std.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20154; 14 Jan 94 15:48 EST
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA17017; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:39:50 -0500
Errors-To: catnip-request@world.std.com
X-Orig-Sender: catnip-request@world.std.com
Reply-To: catnip@world.std.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <crawdad@munin.fnal.gov>
Received: from munin.fnal.gov by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA16997; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 14:39:47 -0500
Received: from LOCALHOST.fnal.gov by munin.fnal.gov with SMTP id AA14771 (5.65c+/IDA-1.4.4 for catnip@world.std.com); Fri, 14 Jan 1994 13:37:32 -0600
Message-Id: <199401141937.AA14771@munin.fnal.gov>
To: catnip@world.std.com
Subject: Re: TTL Uses ???
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 14 Jan 94 09:36:14 PST. <94Jan14.093620pst.12171@skylark.parc.xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 13:37:31 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@munin.fnal.gov>

Steve Deering sez:
> Note, however, that this is third function overloaded onto TTL
> (along with loop-breaking and maximum-lifetime enforcement), and it
> is an ugly hack.

But ... but ... if you could solve three different problems by
*introducing* one little byte, wouldn't you call that a beautiful,
rather than an ugly hack?

I can't quibble with your specific points, it's just a question of
aesthetic values.
_________________________________________________________
Matt Crawford          crawdad@fnal.gov          Fermilab