loop on catnip list

Robert L Ullmann <ariel@world.std.com> Mon, 07 February 1994 19:12 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19127; 7 Feb 94 14:12 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19121; 7 Feb 94 14:12 EST
Received: from news.std.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23326; 7 Feb 94 14:12 EST
Received: from world.std.com by news.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.1) id AA26348; Mon, 7 Feb 1994 14:08:10 -0500
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA25187; Mon, 7 Feb 1994 13:47:05 -0500
Errors-To: catnip-request@world.std.com
X-Orig-Sender: catnip-request@world.std.com
Reply-To: catnip@world.std.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ariel>
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA25168; Mon, 7 Feb 1994 13:47:03 -0500
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 13:47:03 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Robert L Ullmann <ariel@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <199402071847.AA25168@world.std.com>
To: catnip@world.std.com
Subject: loop on catnip list

I just identified (I *think* :-) and shot an arcane
mail loop, involving gate s/w at Lotus that doesn't
understand proper mail semantics. Shouldn't recur.

Rob