updated draft/status/new mail list for IPv7 proposal
ULLMANN@PROCESS.COM (Robert L Ullmann) Fri, 08 January 1993 20:56 UTC
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA12361; Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:56:55 -0500
Errors-To: ipv7-request@world.std.com
Sender: ipv7-request@world.std.com
Reply-To: ipv7@world.std.com
Precedence: bulk
Return-Path: <ULLMANN@PROCESS.COM>
Received: from alcor.process.com by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA12320; Fri, 8 Jan 1993 15:56:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199301082056.AA12320@world.std.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 15:55:00 -0500
From: ULLMANN@PROCESS.COM
To: big-internet@munnari.oz.au
Cc: ipv7@world.std.com
Subject: updated draft/status/new mail list for IPv7 proposal
Status: R
Hi, This is a status update on the IPv7 protocol described in draft-ullmann-ipv7-02.txt, just updated (4 January). Even if you have read previous versions, you should review this. There is also a companion document on routing not released yet. To outline what this IPv7 is about, it: * Meets all of the criteria musts, and most of the shoulds (and all of them at least as well as v4). * Provides a new IP version that interoperates with the existing one; it does NOT require a costly transition plan; it is deployed as a new version as vendors routinely do. * Uses Administrative Domains in the addressing; this is a political necessity as the Internet expands. * Allows 10^6 hosts in each net; 10^8 nets in each AD, and 10^8 ADs. (Enough? :-) The layer boundaries are done with flexible masks, of course. * Separates the forwarding-decision complexity from the routing explosion, and provides a method to make forwarding decision time near-linear with the number of datagrams. (I.e. much less than the ~N(d) * log N(r) typical in v4 routers.) * This also provides for datagrams following flows in a very general model. (E.g. allowing a flow to be bandwidth reserved for any use between two sites, not just particular machines.) * Also upgrades TCP to remove its current painful limitations. (With present CPU and LAN speeds, e.g. 200 mips/100mbps, both sequence space and window in TCPv4 are too small.) * Provides for ICMP messages to travel through both versions and be interpreted properly to the extent needed by existing implementations. * And miscellaneous other good stuff, so go read it. The discussion list is ipv7@world.std.com Remember that subscription requests go to ipv7-request@world.std.com, not to the list. Archive of the list is world.std.com:/pub/ipv7/... Best Regards, Robert
- updated draft/status/new mail list for IPv7 propo… Robert L Ullmann