Re: TTL Uses ???
email@example.com Fri, 14 January 1994 23:07 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16592;
14 Jan 94 18:07 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16588; 14 Jan 94 18:07 EST
Received: from world.std.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24070; 14 Jan 94 18:07 EST
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA17897; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:15:30 -0500
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA17876; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:15:28 -0500
Received: from xirtlu.zk3.dec.com by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com (5.65/13Jan94) id AA26119; Fri, 14 Jan 94 14:10:07 -0800
Received: by xirtlu.zk3.dec.com; id AA11131; Fri, 14 Jan 1994 17:10:05 -0500
To: Steve Deering <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: TTL Uses ???
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 94 09:36:14 PST." <94Jan14.email@example.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 94 17:09:59 -0500
Steve and all responders, Thanks for the responses it made things more clear. I think we are moving much up to the transport. Another example is PMTU Discovery. I am designing a Host now that completely will use PMTU in a lab environment. But NFS and a well known database application use UDP and insist on big packets. I am covering it at the transport layer. thanks again, /jim