Re: [Cbor] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 08 September 2020 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B123A12A9; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ni5Sww9Obiq; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-f174.google.com (mail-il1-f174.google.com [209.85.166.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA133A0CBB; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-f174.google.com with SMTP id m1so15374368ilj.10; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 06:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r+iGLjkS69PMAcih+/paKxuETa1F1sLG0+3NN7pVFXw=; b=PROgMUHYiO8JewXMnetyq+LJY3odvphQvN0qAeOZHfjJWJlLds1KBcZGbPghQMIMOt hAN9Ma3k5MSCnATG8q0t+5maz+ManDYzN3/l/TLnb8ZfWCdaZRUQmb0sckGt3TlyNniJ WYDMd2n/f91hSpLuDjL9Je8vjIdopT5QE923AxudfOx/ISo5QfkM82MKBwwiKUosUx7d JWOzfrNTXDIXhNI+SteDCtB1hsTl7JWLO2MsCIMXc5udbMKFBLhT/V96KjMlfaZPY7gh vPDhpQDB6x0GNQ1ov0hRaA7FnSU0dELKJ8+xtg3RivRBfN3kwB5+qxNejjx18MvVu/wb WBHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CgsNEBydN7zGpdC/3Xo3LKqAajNE9k2lZdlCl70lO3NXRQYGH glvnGlMYaJiwXb2CccdOuTD897IGmeN6d8GrBrg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmKsOUl/Z7P7vIz72CIOoBKfqZCqemwUAqaQRpiUmfa1mYmg+i87YRcLbigfZrl5L686/nbXTgq5/0EUybPO4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d906:: with SMTP id s6mr6297954iln.152.1599572480763; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 06:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159954801165.22491.8758202978139000058@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159954801165.22491.8758202978139000058@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 09:41:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLZJ21Qu=cArjJkh6Bh6qROFYETg4px-3BGw-BVyaUkDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, Samita Chakrabarti <samitac.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/04Kwl-Eu580aSzy4sJ9DNT0XtM8>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf?= =?utf-8?q?-cbor-date-tag-06=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:41:23 -0000

"Unsigned" and "negative" are the names two CBOR data types, and
that's what the text refers to.  It does sound odd when you consider
them as English terms, but they are meant as specific CBOR terms.

Barry

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:53 AM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for the work put into this document.
>
> Thank you Samita Chakrabarti for your IoT directorate review at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-cbor-date-tag-06-iotdir-telechat-chakrabarti-2020-08-31/
>
> Please find below some nits.
>
> I hope that this helps to improve the document,
>
> Regards,
>
> -éric
>
> PS: your example in the security considerations applied to my own birthday in
> Japan then in Canada ;-) and this was my only international date line crossing.
> Good planing of mine ;-)
>
> == NITS ==
>
> -- Section 1 and IANA section --
> In the text "The tagged integer is an unsigned or negative value", should it
> rather be "The tagged integer is a positive or negative value" ?
>
>
>