Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8610 (6526)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 11 April 2021 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC523A155E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aa8l6W73jSvc for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA183A155C for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dc178.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.193.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FJJ7m19cRzyc6; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:02:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210411160226.2F39DF4078C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:02:11 +0200
Cc: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, christoph.vigano@uni-bremen.de, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, barryleiba@computer.org, =?utf-8?Q?Christian_Ams=C3=BCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>, smbarte2@illinois.edu, cbor@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 639853331.217123-810f0af17392c1f56b50f770ec26424e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6613947B-B585-402E-81AE-BC8D754BDC0A@tzi.org>
References: <20210411160226.2F39DF4078C@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/06oYYDrLbiW1sxd_cNLK56xiUFU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8610 (6526)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 17:02:21 -0000

Hi Sean,

thank you for submitting this errata report.
Strangely, another backslash has been swallowed in the text that was mailed around below (it is correct at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6526).

This report should be marked as verified, once it has been ascertained that the backslashes in the record survived.

(For those following along with the other errata report:
This one is about the appendix for CBOR EDN extended diagnostic notation, which has subtly different syntax from CDDL itself, and which is not defined in ABNF.)

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2021-04-11, at 18:02, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8610,
> "Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6526
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sean Bartell <smbarte2@illinois.edu>
> 
> Section: G.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   The escaping rules of JSON strings are applied equivalently for
>   text-based byte strings, e.g., "\" stands for a single backslash and
>   "'" stands for a single quote.  Whitespace is included literally,
>   i.e., the previous section does not apply to text-based byte strings.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   The escaping rules of JSON strings are applied equivalently for
>   text-based byte strings, e.g., "\" stands for a single backslash and
>   "\'" stands for a single quote.  Whitespace is included literally,
>   i.e., the previous section does not apply to text-based byte strings.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> "\" and "'" need a backslash to escape them.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8610 (draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL): A Notational Convention to Express Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and JSON Data Structures
> Publication Date    : June 2019
> Author(s)           : H. Birkholz, C. Vigano, C. Bormann
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG