[Cbor] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11.txt

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

Given that we are keeping edn-literals in orbit for a while, I created an update that addresses some of the excellent editorial feedback from Joe.
I did not work on issues that touch extensibility or its reflection in the ABNF.

Please do make use of
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11
and the closed pull requests #58 to #61 on github
https://github.com/cbor-wg/edn-literal/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed
to see what has changed and why.

See you in 90 minutes!

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2024-08-21, at 14:26, [e-mail] wrote:
> 
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11.txt is now available. It is a
> work item of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and
> Extensions (CBOR) WG of the IETF.
> 
>   Title:   CBOR Extended Diagnostic Notation (EDN)
>   Author:  Carsten Bormann
>   Name:    draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11.txt
>   Pages:   32
>   Dates:   2024-08-21
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>   The Concise Binary Object Representation, CBOR (STD 94, RFC 8949),
>   defines a "diagnostic notation" in order to be able to converse about
>   CBOR data items without having to resort to binary data.  RFC 8610
>   extends this into what is known as Extended Diagnostic Notation
>   (EDN).
> 
>   This document sets forth a further step of evolution of EDN, and it
>   is intended to serve as a single reference target in specifications
>   that use EDN.
> 
>   It specifies how to add application-oriented extensions to the
>   diagnostic notation.  It then defines two such extensions for text
>   representations of epoch-based date/times and of IP addresses and
>   prefixes (RFC 9164).
> 
>   A few further additions close some gaps in usability.  It modifies
>   one extension specified in Appendix G.4 of RFC 8610 to enable further
>   increasing usability.  To facilitate tool interoperation, this
>   document specifies a formal ABNF definition for EDN as defined today,
>   and it adds media types.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-cbor-edn-literals-11