Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-04.txt

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Thu, 23 May 2019 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAF61200B9 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 15:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vzzQIqwGEL-G for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 15:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E182120075 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 15:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 23 May 2019 15:36:15 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: <cbor@ietf.org>
References: <155853566619.11385.15062703999098868761@ietfa.amsl.com> <5CFCEA51-91EB-4FD3-9837-A712DAF7AADD@tzi.org> <003101d511ad$ce1ba3f0$6a52ebd0$@augustcellars.com> <50EF193E-642C-4391-92BF-083C5A1C0E16@tzi.org> <F7A5BAD4-04DA-4F9D-87C7-FA876E4A807D@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F7A5BAD4-04DA-4F9D-87C7-FA876E4A807D@tzi.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 15:36:13 -0700
Message-ID: <003701d511b7$ef362c90$cda285b0$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQHr7swzg0ZjOn9uzsF0MFdjF7mPNgHA1dkWAaO7pi0B2TUliQEyxPSCphgNuQA=
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/1Ntrb0CWpONIWWSqrarfxmwJzUI>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 22:36:24 -0000

No I don't see any reason to reference that.  If it is gone it is gone.  It was just an oddity.  You might stick a note into the comments section for the RFC Editor though.

Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>;
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 2:50 PM
> To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>;
> Cc: cbor@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-array-tags-04.txt
> 
> On May 23, 2019, at 23:32, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; wrote:
> >
> > (I didn’t check archive.org, BTW, but I’m not sure that we want to use that
> here.)
> 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20160329172607/https://www.khronos.org/re
> gistry/typedarray/specs/1.0/
> 
> Should we put that in?
> 
> Grüße, Carsten