From nobody Mon Feb 6 07:54:44 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FDEC14F731 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 07:54:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.696 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=sandelman.ca Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6-nBmSvvL4v for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 07:54:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBE5C153CA1 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 07:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (ipv6.dyas.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:6::1]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B631F47B; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 15:53:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1675698839; bh=qOMG2zqvCdsmN7QKnTVBnTxpMOOpjjzfk13Wa2bD08Q=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=PhNQNjLE+zPlhfmpSIwAiFWeLenQ4CAlpjbqR+01hsV8pfF28uv5t2z8LdNs7XvOP CFwvaNhk1ygPwfX21mPrDCjx2Jcrh2vajMYlvHRRXbJIO9LG554hCZY+Y05MQSKfsR qceyDnOOeHMIY+9wg1lFFeA5HHNeAcqS+CJeG/nbk7jzQJR+yFcCda+vNL9OLamAhP pHxSJS3LXV/atJ58QGJ43tCPQSfSxzRnPfdO9PqwPW3/2nyrGmbmP9MCJnbv/DwWSw AEfxVRT91H783T94lH4QRZg+dmsvXh7T5WqJqOTtR6taNoUqD26ku0t6tZ6oDfvdqU vTMg7E860evpg== Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A145A1E97; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:53:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47779A1E95; Mon, 6 Feb 2023 16:53:55 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Richardson To: Carsten Bormann cc: cbor@ietf.org In-reply-to: <0F5E27CB-44D6-4112-A7BA-8372F36EF3B3@tzi.org> References: <2304074.1675693261@dyas> <0F5E27CB-44D6-4112-A7BA-8372F36EF3B3@tzi.org> Comments: In-reply-to Carsten Bormann message dated "Mon, 06 Feb 2023 15:31:58 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:53:55 +0100 Message-ID: <2312048.1675698835@dyas> Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Cbor] CDDL 2.0 import and paths X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 15:54:43 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Carsten Bormann wrote: >> Carsten Bormann wrote: >>> ;# include rfc9052 >>> ;;; include all the rules from rfc9052.cddl as well as the ones >>> imported/included there, no questions asked >> >> So that's recursive. > Well, cddlc will break its little mind quickly if it actually gets re= cursive=E2=80=A6 I mean, it will pull in all the includes from the includes. >>> ;# import rfc9052 >>> ;;; include only those rules from rfc9052.cddl that actually are >>> undefined references in the current CDDL file, treating rfc9052 as a >>> =E2=80=9Clibrary=E2=80=9D. >> >> So, that's not recursive, and if there were dangling references in >> rf9062.cddl, I'd have to take care of it? > Actually, this also runs a transitive closure *within the imported CD= DL > file*, and it acts on directives inside that (but not adding anything > nested based on undefined references from outside). I added a nested > import directive to rfc9053.cddl, if you want to play with this. I guess I'm not really sure I understand the utility of the difference. >> A question about CDDL_INCLUDE_PATH, does it always start at the begi= nning, or >> does it start at the place in the path where the current file was fo= und? > The path always starts at the beginning. > So you can override/reach into dependency chains (on purpose or inadv= ertently). okay. =2D- Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -=3D IPv6 IoT consulting =3D- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEERK+9HEcJHTJ9UqTMlUzhVv38QpAFAmPhIpIACgkQlUzhVv38 QpDCVAgAmt13pG31fmJpsgh0O8gKHyePdfS9lEbolowUQ+aHz4Ix9juV8lvZAdSB gchAwUBPK4cVUVYjY/wzLNJivbiLWopijXjnshgPFA8NEwCsq20rMuVQy/2NFExx RlNwmTORZdbrMKAZjLqKnXB9vWf7rbs0CmFsdWrK/TSEeuwN5yRHU3atlbeJrGX/ anbfJgqlg5pSdQPus+EcnOG6F+VFvL474xCbSOCAZG1sZmNSig9/t9YKSmfawBgB wPEldktI3bxC0MqnPB/KDmR5WPqJFH7MAWMzlSwis2076Wce+sUKWBIYhR9NlNsE zHgEmfXdCdeZTDLHAsO/vUHpXT9btw== =DA97 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--