Re: [Cbor] 7049bis: The concept of "optional tagging" is not really used in practice #126

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Sun, 03 November 2019 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F27F12082F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:08:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USBHJ2RJY02z for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.72.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24CAF120110 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 13:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPS id xA3L83EH031976 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 3 Nov 2019 22:08:04 +0100
Received: from [192.168.16.50] (79.234.112.245) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.468.0; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 22:07:58 +0100
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
CC: <cbor@ietf.org>, Christophe Lohr <christophe.lohr@imt-atlantique.fr>
References: <92400DAA-A713-4905-A721-34B138E25192@tzi.org> <ed45e995-1858-3169-1be6-0cce5ce37ce3@imt-atlantique.fr> <87889E65-0152-455A-A6B7-C5F336DC97A4@island-resort.com> <CBC1EF6C-FAF5-4AC9-B0DC-C3FD2ED8B88D@tzi.org> <8B119642-7D8D-4BEF-AD75-0AC9935BCD7C@island-resort.com> <B86EE13B-12C9-4918-8BE9-5E4BEBF3B779@tzi.org>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <0b6b6814-2c58-5f3f-6932-796f0978ae37@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 22:07:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B86EE13B-12C9-4918-8BE9-5E4BEBF3B779@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [79.234.112.245]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/23GSc7om2Y5LtPfddbNTyk7SyKg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 7049bis: The concept of "optional tagging" is not really used in practice #126
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 21:08:13 -0000

Okay, as I am only seem to add redundancy, I'll just add an offset of 30 
min before I reply here :o)

On 03.11.19 22:05, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2019, at 22:02, Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>; wrote:
>>
>> Would be cool if there were standard CDDL definitions ready for normative reference for all the “tagged” data types defined in 7049 / 7049bis.
> 
> Do you mean anything beyond Appendix D of RFC 8610?
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8610#appendix-D
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
>