IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)

Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> Mon, 31 March 2025 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: cbor@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30FB152C241; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6FAVZ71Iy8a; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F66152C23B; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43ce71582e9so31652405e9.1; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743431737; x=1744036537; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sbjPAdeouGjSoGvYqZm9sN5bYSZ27u81xl/xSFAQLIc=; b=KyvNryREFbcYktiSAL4BpjlRY0Amj/rFtZ0TLuFe4ib7inoYxwDqQFHkPwLDDbGAXg +/Ap+R1iHTAltlv/7q1aYWF1YGzpCGjnTB83qN+GtF+5sIktUmNOA/M4l59EEJjGAtS0 G7VQ179Tteqa0ZNuyWq5xdTuz+V96epaaMdzMkfofDq0TRtDLCGCpFpX6u1NULyv7TSL pkIHR1EcCb4mRVxopYCdNI9sV6EEPp3XXqkg74IyF/9eS7Ag85n5oRRrrvTNCvGKVpA4 FoV0b995KFGIUrAJmQe5xTeIbxgfF/VnlCkweL8+BqrkgDF3KQVkKHteuTvpGB1raSfM HUPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743431737; x=1744036537; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sbjPAdeouGjSoGvYqZm9sN5bYSZ27u81xl/xSFAQLIc=; b=nmG2cJaZ6hs6HboJYNJ6clf1LXmJMLyT3pVi6W1Km4ac0kJNUjQnUnt9dyhQPK6+dd GEyzEFNumXr2hiTClRuHNm6QAGloMZGZ8Z4QL3Wa1xIu1BPwUJ1aWHYbUCRAmePMh3pk weeUuUau86QDCuuzHu+a3g/TeEzdjq/3HGpw5fE4F/s5QgVxyz3qGxPzwGSHECWNH0ut KsYeCPfpFUxL8QBglsHSKKN9Ll7fr3Uq816MeliySuQ0+MqZZBtEUZdzO7zQErt9vWKw wYbWkSiXgM/2oNXsRnJm16Dvyb0TdOvPzzDpJ2ZvxKrbQv942KM0/IQLcRZcaH8DLkvK 8d8A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWgYJFyAp6fcC8E96kPWP0Our5peB1jR0coN5hVxm/l/aOitUkKwOtvxiiloUfy8dZUWUJ/3pQ2FtxHZEMA8XCLqtCq@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/ATbjr/d6jB3hFs6NHYsmr/y23pK85w2WfGq5JQ2+s+qh7tC8 I0l3FAWz51yqW2SKgOZq86dQA2n8DJ4gmmS1M65uQiN4T/LSJ4Ur
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsMwITG8DPABvIchr44d8oofcyDcAejPAFjPL+2uBMUhGKe9Q1Hp6EV0tU1OG1 X15KzgLdorvSuv/mNiYn6fzyI6c8PPw/JpRJLJKFQ7ynMZAFzLabIU6Z8c6Zptvr/w6dn3bcpso ca2YDSg1yTBOKXcehJ+aeCuzlpTbLa7DjrBEJ+18QoMSoWNeTuwJl2inVnYOUmnr/Xd+D19rEx4 39ptPHGi2fdIw4XG0xUqc8Jh6BOsV+MIp/oILpgA0Dg59BQrXCF5A34wX+54+xM1tIePtY8C/1J ed5f/v3tvH+0FSR9DUDZClyougQ64mYfq9m6YrHEnjJZtGGvyB4rMBmXXDIS+ijvtoaOjHw/6bS NLxIr5LLyQpKw2uPmzXRSIkufwP6MiaZGUc3+xZ7p07nRWf2LOQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHapMwPop3x4TdxQZwXPVb5Ih4J3toGZ+Wd+O566GdGkbvUQY6MobAqNwc1CyaFCoxdHXYHdQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1e23:b0:434:fa55:eb56 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-43db61cebecmr92478775e9.7.1743431737244; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2a01:e0a:e1b:64b0:71a0:cf25:8780:7d7d? ([2a01:e0a:e1b:64b0:71a0:cf25:8780:7d7d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d900013besm124878545e9.38.2025.03.31.07.35.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Mar 2025 07:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <80c79b4e-6823-4598-b7c4-1dfc4cc34e6b@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:35:36 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <Z8oi3HMTum5eriSw@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <ABE85E99-9B1F-4B09-8910-9CEB58DA1240@tzi.org> <721e2b78-9fa6-45d6-abbc-bb5936bf015d@gmail.com> <7C28DF0E-29B6-4246-86A0-665CF30C2EA1@tzi.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C28DF0E-29B6-4246-86A0-665CF30C2EA1@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: S5MQKZCXQMQFJHPSWAXHVJRWFPRELPUH
X-Message-ID-Hash: S5MQKZCXQMQFJHPSWAXHVJRWFPRELPUH
X-MailFrom: anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-cde@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] Re: WGLC redux (Re: 🔔 WGLC on draft-ietf-cbor-cde-08)
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/4gIkBOx4kRy42nUAZRujaQ42cuw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

On 2025-03-31 16:00, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2025-03-31, at 14:57, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> We can WGLC cbor-cde anytime, personally, I stick to RFC8949.
> 
> Well, CDE sticks to RFC 8949 as well.
> 
> I don’t think you win anything by acting otherwise.

A difference is that my take on the matter presumes a profiled representation/encoding scheme, including for numbers.

Since the latter has proved to be impossible to reach an agreement on, this work (regardless if it is good or bad), is clearly out of scope for the IETF.

Since it nowadays supports 99.9% of the CBOR constructs being candidates for deterministic encoding (only NaN with payloads didn't make it to the party), I'm thinking of rebranding this work-item to "CBOR Core".

Anders

> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list -- cbor@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cbor-leave@ietf.org

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status