Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sun, 15 August 2021 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9883A21A7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cvWvjdPK49I0 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 12:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68F13A21A9 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 12:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GnnmS64pKz2xJm; Sun, 15 Aug 2021 21:44:08 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <162905624171.27660.137292813847150167@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 21:44:08 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 650749448.297731-3ae800969991a3ccbed640049c37d86e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72D87F89-A426-4513-B60C-F1761CEC255E@tzi.org>
References: <162905624171.27660.137292813847150167@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/4x56swmIiWeRbMtvYOqdDoPGvZg>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 19:44:18 -0000

Notable-tags-04 is a snapshot which is mostly notable [duuh] for the text that fills in Section 6.1:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04.html#name-advanced-arithmetic

There are still quite a few pieces of skeleton text; I hope we can fill these in before the next CBOR interim, so we can discuss whether this draft should be a WG document.

The rfcdiff is a bit damaged by the overly long lines in -03, if you want to peruse it, just scroll to the right and look at what has been added.

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2021-08-15, at 21:37, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 
>        Title           : Notable CBOR Tags
>        Author          : Carsten Bormann
> 	Filename        : draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04.txt
> 	Pages           : 23
> 	Date            : 2021-08-15
> 
> Abstract:
>   The Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC 8949) is a data
>   format whose design goals include the possibility of extremely small
>   code size, fairly small message size, and extensibility without the
>   need for version negotiation.
> 
>   In CBOR, one point of extensibility is the definition of CBOR tags.
>   RFC 8949's original edition, RFC 7049, defined a basic set of tags as
>   well as a registry that can be used to contribute additional tag
>   definitions [IANA.cbor-tags].  Since RFC 7049 was published, some 80
>   tag definitions have been added to that registry.
> 
>   The present document provides a roadmap to a large subset of these
>   tag definitions.  Where applicable, it points to a IETF standards or
>   standard development document that specifies the tag.  Where no such
>   document exists, the intention is to collect specification
>   information from the sources of the registrations.  After some more
>   development, the present document is intended to be useful as a
>   reference document for the IANA registrations of the CBOR tags the
>   definitions of which have been collected.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bormann-cbor-notable-tags-04
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt