Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 03 March 2023 06:32 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C4BC151536 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 22:32:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y-U5NxjPFHqE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 22:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA05C14CE2E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 22:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PSdSc0KWQzDCch; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 07:32:48 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <21bb85c3-cd05-2ba2-205b-df9ec061346d@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 07:32:37 +0100
Cc: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>, cbor@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8A5C7DB9-3E76-43BB-8195-0B9211670755@tzi.org>
References: <9a7befb3-8410-78f7-f7fc-6aeee90100b6@gmail.com> <21bb85c3-cd05-2ba2-205b-df9ec061346d@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/5yj1iGOEp0yMq8yZUn1HUg9DU5s>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:32:55 -0000
On 3. Mar 2023, at 03:46, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > > Would it be possible to process this request? Sure. The specification would be improved if it could make up its mind whether the id is an object identifier or a type identifier. (Both can be useful.) > COTX should be considered as a WG item since it simplifies object Id handling in systems consisting of dozens and continuously upgraded objects. I don’t believe that this should be picked up as a WG item, but it also doesn’t need to be one for registering the tag. Grüße, Carsten
- Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag IANA registration request Anders Rundgren