[Cbor] CDE next steps (Re: Reminder: CBOR WG Virtual Meeting on 2024-12-11)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 11 December 2024 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D354C1DC81B for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:14:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 446MQAOptRqN for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B54C1DFD34 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.145] (p548dc3ec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.195.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Y7gdr6sgDzDCcl; Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:14:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <B807C9D3-39A4-4024-BC1D-85DD84EA1735@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:14:08 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 755626448.479377-49ee8b12f209da8e01db4c197767a5e3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8337314C-C3C6-488B-8CA3-FFD176782637@tzi.org>
References: <CALaySJKDFscUBGw4CPspXJvUTkXywVHc_FrmhO3ybBWTrwjGXw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJ8-M9x8irtmF2pfDE3GRXU1am9n2a3XeDcmPT+kww+KA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKTQT_9CC-wVVd+fY1NYJ73M8CP22hn=rWrFeTJSJDEsA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKG3oagg6ffLTx8LgvLvnjHHA2DMGgY74E0q=rReAc4PA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLtUR1=G_WH4H+zoJ5LCrHjBgEf1oW104zDtFQighY+gg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJLnKxU9m3BNPq4XayrSrorRBG2vuBz1AF-CsEBoSZe7Xg@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKaz7C=GN5E=saiDY4KxL+9xCfM0ocZuMStEQ96FnQ4KA@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJEXkey9vLAp8VqDXmPsWpxiWN9jjtVnGio1nMQ4K+mDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJfc+tET4Vm5UQjHPK5mf61O0iR-1i6=X32CYtWxZLWTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKdrk7aPzhT=kbE1B8pq1EBw74nmx_peSJMAoHsG5jyVQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+fWX4zEnE5v-Q9R6eCv=kSJjnc-fsXL5PGPgac1GJAcA@mail.gmail.com> <B807C9D3-39A4-4024-BC1D-85DD84EA1735@tzi.org>
To: CBOR <cbor@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Message-ID-Hash: UABMRCDZ42TKOXOYB3DCE26B44A6R2YK
X-Message-ID-Hash: UABMRCDZ42TKOXOYB3DCE26B44A6R2YK
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cbor.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Cbor] CDE next steps (Re: Reminder: CBOR WG Virtual Meeting on 2024-12-11)
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)" <cbor.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/7FSRKAaOWuhZExigsV9ABwhE4b0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cbor-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cbor-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cbor-leave@ietf.org>

Given that we didn’t have time to discuss CDE [1], here’s what I plan to do now:

* Implement LL’s suggestion to avoid the term “ALDR profile” by using “ALDR rule set” or a similar term.

* Check the stale PR #10 whether there is something salvageable (this is editorial and does not merge at this point; I also think it loses some information so it needs some meticulous attention if we want to do that editorial work).

… and then publish a -07.

Maybe we can decide on the list whether we want to WGLC that even before the Jan 8 interim four weeks from now.
(The technical points we have previously been discussing are long covered, so it is time that we step out of the Brownian motion and do that.)

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cbor-cde-06.html