Re: [Cbor] Supporting IPv6 Link-Local with scope (was Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 06 October 2021 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13F13A0784; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oszZv1VBwhTo; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9173A0783; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 15:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id on6so3310028pjb.5; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sMJX7haAfqmXAg1PoKjSxiwJN71E6zyA76WPzNTJ1uw=; b=JJfVc5a+ns+t3SC/5iktZGpi2qDW16zTSY4AfD2t2LxTBlkF3H0QFDcBlb+VbA/LYu GEf7up/pBjfFYOlRG9/MwLQo8zrTPdVb2hDZ+BoEA9Qtthe1Qt2PLYmi74F5N0xU3gyA d/YAzZ2tLUjluHqMGjMjsruUaKUysDpE52YOU0vCxx4w95C/Tb1+AXoRJIs59gGoMj/A J8cpYU23W4MIJy+sHIcTR9HDsDPSlOLZYZdHH9FVRmhi2yWggqjQsDPTlZ8OrWtz4lrE 4Too2OVtUNE7OC6Ro385MSh1UsNwxNCRn8FW2LtxxeZ7NsNaUnxQ/wqgBEmyLPM7GmZF 3qYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sMJX7haAfqmXAg1PoKjSxiwJN71E6zyA76WPzNTJ1uw=; b=5HfE+Jws+vd7J1nTOEmQg3PiRRz1Wk1jdm4TkEEqLd53n/SVWDVjjuitHqc19u75Yz /rHmgSS3GJMjjgxd/PA+YjRIx9OVV+NWDucCTOzmjQ2BqzcOHw5AUfCI1mKqk/sA0wr8 Cse5JHewMSf1SZr36U0Cw4pWvGuNNV0cynbNfnHqg4ijGzjzEfGyd7oXNQSFe8fPqJcK T0sniHolCRjQfYmMpDj3hkNEO9z6shEXYyOnYH35jsMMJNBlcM4SlffhURmXoDwItQhx OEv+gaLqJRPYYrxuUX4Hpo7DCFjpwFOInLXpX4RXH51Jcvc4zpyijL3EiLbs9c6Owgua /a3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D3zl4ItwLicwOYdFHg4brypdEFSh/zwp/xioGfZcflPQT5xBh awil/R9gPNuBh1v+VM0CT4Ht7SFq204nfQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+jpCMYguUFDRD5TbT4MGpkcgJa2+uzSiQXITYGhWbP3RQwo5rEYYHzTFb689/VzMXF93F0A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5502:: with SMTP id b2mr1506464pji.154.1633560294776; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k6sm2912573pfg.18.2021.10.06.15.44.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, cbor@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, cbor-chairs@ietf.org
References: <163344085669.17315.998599560097016034@ietfa.amsl.com> <24367.1633460118@localhost> <1fcf3889-57d1-83f5-2913-51ae9155130b@gmail.com> <6442.1633537138@localhost> <9D5E9264-0A10-4A24-8F23-DB89EDE851B9@tzi.org> <9043.1633557346@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <372df336-eb01-de6d-2e11-e094b9ff7cfd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 11:44:48 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9043.1633557346@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/81lfSrm4oxjnOfpEG56RDVBu76I>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Supporting IPv6 Link-Local with scope (was Re: Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 22:45:01 -0000

On 07-Oct-21 10:55, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>     > On 6. Oct 2021, at 18:18, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Hi, at the CBOR WG meeting this morning, support for IPv6 LL scopes
>     >> was the major topic.
> 
>     > YANG ietf-inet-types has zones for IPv4.
>     > Shouldn’t we, too?
> 
> Are there any OSes and Applications that really know how to deal with having
> IPv4-LL addresses on multiple interfaces?  And didn't IPv4 die awhile back?
> 
> If you really think we should do this for IPv4, I don't really object.
> I just don't know what RFCs to cite.

That's probably because there are none. As far as I know, there is no
"Scoped architecture for IPv4" RFC. I don't know why there is YANG support.

Michael's text citing RFC4007 looks good to me.

    Brian