From nobody Sat Feb 25 15:00:27 2023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C36C14EB15; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:00:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.396 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5zt2rMjBJhZ; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:00:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D4BAC151531; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 15:00:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B35A3898F; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 18:31:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NYcg0YA4lySu; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 18:31:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA913898E; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 18:31:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1677367905; bh=WXl5wahEWTi6t2fKSi7eeE6T38POdkIhIMM2ybSWzoM=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=aviJ+oCsMs0sHzFEcIu50mzC4gjpdSvXAfGsbV98FGaT/Aw2XVan3J5QjTxO1rlpr 06LCbaC4Yq9E1UTuiiH2ecNe0qVAWljPHQJJLtDdcI4SLniOmfP7G8l8luD2iX+85c LjOAj0aBrGfqBytzqXOmQzuMWRUdImqXslivp7+eGfvE344liQiTshcqiFiY9TWNUV QEKNljZDZmIDknqvJWWDjmAXhbIRE4U2iPV8BJdoi2Poa6X5ptOcn8xDaP4Z8FiuW6 0yvcNpBocaV7nN7VQjwIoo+7G4xt5AUX4Qm2Jx2ixuC5d7qsLcodxQODaf/vkClxnE iHp8h91ZSTCqw== Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111592A5; Sat, 25 Feb 2023 18:00:13 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: Carsten Bormann , "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" , cbor@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org In-Reply-To: References: <5935.1677359412@localhost> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Cbor] [core] CDDL Model for YANG-SID (draft-ietf-core-sid) X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 23:00:22 -0000 Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2023-02-25, at 22:52, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> >>> RFC8366. >> >> Good idea. Let=E2=80=99s see when I get to it=E2=80=A6 > Examples don=E2=80=99t validate. Yes, I know that the base64 isn't valid. I guess we should have made it valid base64, even if it was nonsense inside. Putting ten lines of base64 signature in the example in the middle of the text seemed distracting to re= aders. >>> Base64.strict_encode64(Base64.decode64("base64encodedvalue=3D=3D")) > =3D> "base64encodedvaluQ=3D=3D=E2=80=9C > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten