Re: [Cbor] Starting WGLC on draft-iet-cbor-sequence

John Mattsson <john.mattsson@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <john.mattsson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0412098E for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ih8CAcOmvOF2 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A81512096C for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id 201so5333923qkm.9 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GhIbHkicXTQCEqIAfISpoL2+EB18Y9v5Sl67VomhJN4=; b=eEvi2GWjH605NTDQ9RGxnzns/RydMNTbWvjui16c1xXkeXEwfUzNKuM13SeII3Btiy ahPxfY4ctLQdazxW9rtjMKWLYosqUxoT6SdivXPDFh7ZZZGNerjE3sslAqWOVGb8Bwq2 mPuFpS5er6UQ6rXb0nFlVJ77qi6sCFOrkxNW3FLLmoGU4N2p2OWDX9q8sWtTL0GnIqFk Rg9d7SfJKgz2Qe7kwPiyHzIrKNAtM5cv23dZyKWpbNr3XNs9LXDLuwi+w/OCI9aQSM9r E02c4dV+qx1uB4AmjNLld3m+ahB5f56rN6DNZOykGwMEusWSUFppjcjxBJkA4B3UMsUF QMZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GhIbHkicXTQCEqIAfISpoL2+EB18Y9v5Sl67VomhJN4=; b=kTWNMVTrLaX3qxAKQMO378cG+Wm40sR/B0exFu+vRNqqTTaWhvPHwXXdq0mqRV+tOn +jv3A9t2zntRJ03m7fqfAK5hT2O/LkohLcyuTCOK1eqL7ksKtU+kfvi662pXc5VHpttx 8wwT9Ly0c2TRc5+e7XvyYJM+AkH4D5/Ypk0XrDRmW4+ymtcWxsCmTtZy/CAzpxo38it3 VGrm766Hlwd9NYIMYB7z6xwiBCZC+IBG1u/9TclwkQ9cMTxlDwNyu9fa+GAswd7dmU1F o4gH8ewnruXeKl8v1Gv3RBXO0xjIZoqTaTqQjLUzYjAH3v1BV1vghKHoYk+6TOL/wUMZ B9HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVoA1AP9wgT/h6RSUnFNi6TwukI2PdOlxWcokGdu7qrk+BhvlHj MtVqdR9QXp7EAM/3UzQtLdLO8RwLzRF6Ou8x9/kEmKkr
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybqOtxWrAK7LwkmcWlDuIuvQRx6Ne+O4WLrWz8K6IMVOnWLGF2BZYuaHvilH9tkDpku+E8VQ0h3tFmBshKDbo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1492:: with SMTP id w18mr28274536qkj.497.1566325720031; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: John Mattsson <john.mattsson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CABQOnqmV8VtGwc6vTw=UcDGvbebO=ZQ2abDYdA7YrvyDrFqDxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000253673059090a048"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/Chj3TqcT-kAR5Xt8ZWa6A4fyGB8>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Starting WGLC on draft-iet-cbor-sequence
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:57:23 -0000

Hi,

I have read read the document and think it is ready to to progress.

- The document talks about CDDL:

"CDDL currently does not provide for unadorned CBOR sequences as a
   top-level subject of a specification."

I think it should something about diagnostic notation as well.

Cheers,
John