Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag range IANA allocation policy

Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586D612023B for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZRTvC59jxl25 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C8012028B for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id j6so10442005ybm.7 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ypuSF9g3/MRm/zOoHZgWhWZldhud24QAlB6VTssRnnw=; b=Fr9S531+72xKL/lpa8/GuLR7cGNFGnnmt5iFL6NLHskfuCutdiV3BqKanZ60ttNd41 W+8puWYeYk4G+azka64B6HnQyKAhzKLSLvoV5EcJCPyHo7lAVz3iRArFTgMqdqNnfZGX FykLI+iPA7A/kYMbfFfGu9vuDkJNgmTuu4cONUv1M4oNbF9iRmVj0uIXDAeb0nZ8OpTV QKvizr9Atn+RjFbvI+ySpx5LFbnX+T//LTOc1zXKnycMiDSbsWRlYY14xtHjJypxQ881 e+THBiztBWGMdgm2hbW0A+vfXLYeprTzzmi60Smv+5BWgX0qBDgvrm/PVzz+02zhJwuT ri3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ypuSF9g3/MRm/zOoHZgWhWZldhud24QAlB6VTssRnnw=; b=G0hywCL81Z5keNZJcywyOPAxXhP+BZJredU4R+FwS30i0I52l6Qkf1EljHS/iI7jsK 6m5qN9QT5lEoyWKtNi+ts1xFWbe10SMQ6TOL1cJ/gSZO3dZzkIB1Tpj6UUsSgnjJXtwK 8t1ejPNYtQWPVmlI/o6qRq/tTPDeh9BZx7ImxAHBsVzjJEOUvVIY7JoHe9N39ZKDjNa/ 4dxvNWAsqj8Mp/Pm+X8XMDxWu6WPdliNqISaAzLBbWLfp37tOloTXreiJh+XaV6XsMXb cbIIndsWUSuJDc8ObW6x8HL7IfFq8Zmm0+EsaK8v5xxPWVyWoPOC292tP46gnTMIxmYJ a3eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrTXrWt+8JIwAZOwH5gu9vdDqerHOJPncG/vcymmJq+fxeAHBp rnXMeayARst20EvhAjlRUuWo+UGLmVlCygkh8nI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhhip/WAr43XQ3aZhsq9ubjTuGe4dCKC4BYYxkJFieKNzShqR1ig4jRtdJc/V1U/8mFPinX//DbN9/SBxwmK0=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1283:: with SMTP id 125mr57108014ybs.55.1564089959112; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <07D48905-77B6-447B-8CEB-971CD0568FB9@seantek.com> <10096467.9kdZcmANtY@tjmaciei-mobl1>
In-Reply-To: <10096467.9kdZcmANtY@tjmaciei-mobl1>
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:25:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN40gSt-h+HGLJuTUFMHn3jjOqMJyJjetdSiW1e-o3uZcZ8a3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000068e3ed058e881259"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/DwwBH7w0KFK8BvmNsth7w8D0uoo>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] CBOR tag range IANA allocation policy
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:26:07 -0000

Hi,

(possibly putting foot in mouth)

I think it's a bad practice to lower a previous IANA requirement for any
number
range in a registry (especially from specification required to one instance
of
Internet-Draft and two weeks of silent approval).

Cheers,
- Ira

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434



On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:19 PM Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>;
wrote:

> On Thursday, 25 July 2019 13:38:41 PDT Sean Leonard wrote:
> > Hi WG, what is the current stance on changing the IANA Considerations for
> > tag registration?
> >
> > I find the RFC 7049 tag registration scheme (0-31 = standards action,
> 32-255
> > = specification required, 256+ = FCFS) to be acceptable.
> >
> > However, I think that maybe we want to encourage more tag registration,
> > while also having a bigger space for more review and publication. I read
> > the minutes and am not sure if there is a current stance or a group sense
> > on the matter, at least within the past 12 months.
>
> Could we get 32-255 to be slightly stricter but not to the level of
> standards
> action? I was thinking of publication of a draft to this WG and allow for
> a 2-
> week comment period. This could both spur ideas from other passive
> watchers
> and ensure high quality of the ones that do get published.
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
>