IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 30 September 2021 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5143A082F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzED2ZFAkV92 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD4D3A082E for <cbor@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A841800F; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:37:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1M3AYxyURy0g; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:37:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6AA1800D; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:37:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65266665; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:29:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: cbor@ietf.org, rjsparks@nostrum.com
In-Reply-To: <D222210E-7752-4750-BD85-A05E412E24F9@tzi.org>
References: <163209269789.22340.15328778942438342106@ietfa.amsl.com> <d284d8db-35e9-9825-40ff-b318acf3b5b9@sandelman.ca> <D222210E-7752-4750-BD85-A05E412E24F9@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:29:22 -0400
Message-ID: <4226.1633026562@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/GdQR6zQMIimgrLnHF3xflpOT8Rc>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:29:35 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    >> -IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54" to registrations 260 and 261
    >> +IANA is requested to add the note "DEPRECATED in favor of 52 and 54 for IP addresses" to registrations 260 and 261

    > I’m still not sure that the WG can deprecate other peoples’
    > registrations, but ignoring that, I think that is a good resolution of
    > the MAC address issue for now.

Maybe the shepherd write up could ask the IESG for their view.
Maybe the shepherd could note it was a WG decision :-)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status