Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/CBORbis] Section 7.1 and IANA considerations. (#196)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 03 June 2020 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03573A07A1 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 07:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emD6d5w7PZLJ for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 07:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8503A05A4 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 07:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49cWQg2WPLzyYv; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:25:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/196@github.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 16:25:14 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 612887114.930734-93b04a559ef0f8864c2a5e3717b43446
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C2C810C-FE93-4E32-9FD9-A685F2380629@tzi.org>
References: <cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/196@github.com>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/GgZKkCOKNqXiouSiEryTNbVShZ0>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] [cbor-wg/CBORbis] Section 7.1 and IANA considerations. (#196)
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 14:25:23 -0000

I just submitted a pull request that addresses some comments on Section 7.1, extension points.
I used the occasion to pick up the idea to move the lower half of the 1+2 tag space (256 to 32767) to specification required.

Comments on this?

> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
> 
>   https://github.com/cbor-wg/CBORbis/pull/196

Grüße, Carsten