IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-02.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 09 June 2021 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBA53A18B3 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvVp55m79yP7 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC873A18B0 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701BA38AE1; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:13:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 212eNMMBiNgs; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8E838AD6; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57EF486; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DE9E58FC-13DE-4AD5-B0EC-EBF0DC13153A@tzi.org>
References: <161530094514.13640.13557132723821236873@ietfa.amsl.com> <DE9E58FC-13DE-4AD5-B0EC-EBF0DC13153A@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:13:08 -0400
Message-ID: <22908.1623247988@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/GuzcRBbgd8eUPRh6W89666VDg_k>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] I-D Action: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-02.txt
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:13:17 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > I just had occasion to check RFC 8992 (should have done that earlier, ouch).

    > prefval /= pref6val
    > pref6val = [version6, length, ?prefix]
    > version6 = 6
    > length = 0..128             ; requested or offered prefix length
    > prefix = bytes .size 16     ; offered prefix in binary format

    > prefval /= pref4val
    > pref4val = [version4, length4, ?prefix4]
    > version4 = 4
    > length4 = 0..32             ; requested or offered prefix length
    > prefix4 = bytes .size 4     ; offered prefix in binary format

    > Maybe we should supply some CDDL in draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses
    > so people don’t start to copy the above whenever they need a prefix.

I dont object.... but don't we need #include first :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email