IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] WGLC review of draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-09

Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com> Sat, 07 December 2019 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lgl@island-resort.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AED120116 for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:32:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.073, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pgOwcvEzdmsE for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa09-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF559120072 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 21:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.76] ([76.167.193.86]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPA id dShHifniPyTItdShIiNrus; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 22:32:04 -0700
From: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@island-resort.com>
Message-Id: <D95C6A9D-7DCF-4A2F-BF59-C89A598C7924@island-resort.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D8AF43E-1DAF-4797-8497-5984CCA6ADF0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 21:32:03 -0800
In-Reply-To: <036501d5ac98$201dd490$60597db0$@augustcellars.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
References: <036501d5ac98$201dd490$60597db0$@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNifeVf+zO3PTdiDFSJ2sjVvGGHCJp48Qq/eN7+hOuBC9oiFChNS4IfQo6Z7BJw0Ho+xO6bIlnc/BTBmpdjWAzh762VIB5SIphyDfPSvg8Ay7k3ub2Ll 0sjCd/l2fO6U7dyzPwZPU9l8o3d5E8c3ONFcnPHBYYvx2ANqV4Flh4rOC/OE2dCOGIY5meOtFGs9cH0il2uo/MzL85+fCc+MVGyjb8vtGegMgxZRE/kOZr9Q uPHd8RVatErZfRnaBJIs4w==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/H5D2cZwDf2CbimxVsjHomXnsxjc>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] WGLC review of draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-09
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 05:32:06 -0000


> On Dec 6, 2019, at 4:49 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> 
> * Section 3.4.2 - Is this section and 3.4.3 supposed to be at the same level
> s 3.4.1 or are they meant to be children?

Children

LL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email