Re: [Cbor] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt> (CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes) to Proposed Standard

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 08 September 2021 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B9F3A0033; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5-Jr9JGkM1eF; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6793A0029; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id bg1so2073269plb.13; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JJBz7QUcLIKaJzGrqOcMBvC0fv3feg3QEypJ8Rb6ItI=; b=H+BWZ0OebvPDPOjhgb+LJMeV7lQSqeO49p3m5RvUCKLsOFIf86rgp4u+4y5CZdczX5 /fJuIiheEmuXUwBXkF2yOx9GIHc+pMAgLIDq0hhJ0NI2KyqvxMksPtlY6epQAy9TADfC qY5z7NuBcw0nxviRKH6ZOC5vUDuxs8r4vFqVGGTuQnFpXzqnYuY2DN8RTUnUpZHiJ0WB hkDlrjr2bqhs8naHgdof3J00Sw1d1gzUpL4pc0WfVjga8KUh5Bcr964b0TxMfGfkUVL3 vEaD57DCypi7cVZxzLRlPjIG02gHrjuoz75PnkoPtaf7rfFqGYVjEYkQyMJ6NzBcUGXO WHTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JJBz7QUcLIKaJzGrqOcMBvC0fv3feg3QEypJ8Rb6ItI=; b=IUT1in6AOUpKluvrTGxe4YdWDk9ewfrXdaMBFe9e4KE+OyYCdZ+chxlY9nIW+ooD8R 56FKSOTMLZRMWTV2uvjqa9XVKgm25VktceEQl2UO44Dip9lqGpl1FBRJMPiTHiht+Tm2 coIUYx7s0igfuP/LHHy/Q+Zpz9OAMO+JV7JKtVmtrywdKW0L5Pj/GtVEa5FlL3K2b/80 OcomfTfiYkTvUA7rx5oyBedtIobe5Scj+M38dsowqbigWUqichdo/BluqUXiNLu4hyOQ cmtbGTngqIrezUWRnHEia/5az+aCnto9j/ALcp21bdJmIv7RtVCXClyUjujOkdzkQNVi E+Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oPBfF3arV/kYZP1FCnP1kJ9h0a8nsWk5krwLCKQPICn+Gyn+1 NvgzRWhaQUf+fmM54IuUrOn9en7rI2Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy88CwNp30GjzlBKLrKf2PelE1qXHW+av3hzOWOMC8MVbCByem4z4yfJx+Rq3zic8Uq/NnRlA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:18d:b0:138:7d06:dbca with SMTP id z13-20020a170903018d00b001387d06dbcamr226041plg.19.1631135719823; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm80229pgp.81.2021.09.08.14.15.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: last-call@ietf.org
Cc: cbor@ietf.org, cbor-chairs@ietf.org, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses@ietf.org
References: <163112819739.28937.13787943927881397568@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <25bd8934-71cf-826a-c3eb-4018269732b1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 09:15:14 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <163112819739.28937.13787943927881397568@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/HFZUFvy7SEVaNMGewNhP4Eg-XVU>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt> (CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 21:15:27 -0000

I'll just note that I re-implemented my demo code for RFC8992 using
these tags instead of the format in that RFC, and this was easy and
works well.

Code at https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy/blob/master/pfxm4.py

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 09-Sep-21 07:09, The IESG wrote:
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Concise Binary Object Representation
> Maintenance and Extensions WG (cbor) to consider the following document: -
> 'CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes'
>   <draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2021-09-22. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This specification defines two CBOR Tags to be used with IPv6 and
>    IPv4 addresses and prefixes.
> 
> 
>    // RFC-EDITOR-please-remove: This work is tracked at
>    // https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses/
> 
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> CBOR@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
>