From nobody Wed Feb 22 02:33:13 2023
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AFC15155E;
 Wed, 22 Feb 2023 02:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.186
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
 RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001,
 URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 6N25Gigoinfg; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 02:33:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B59DC15152B;
 Wed, 22 Feb 2023 02:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [84.141.201.164])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PMCCz6PJczDCbv;
 Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:33:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 698754783.2194459-17a41f2073ffc832620fdfcb3f95ed0d
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:33:03 +0100
Message-Id: <B81A8FEF-C091-47C0-8DB4-3B20F658CBCF@tzi.org>
To: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/HIxEclqNDesdvj1hD-msauUXL7Y>
Subject: [Cbor] Managing CBOR numbers in Internet-Drafts
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>,
 <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:33:13 -0000

After running into the problem again while developing another draft, I =
finally wrote up how I think we should handle the management of CBOR =
numbers while developing Internet-Drafts.

=
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bormann-cbor-draft-numbers-00
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-cbor-draft-numbers-00.html =
(readable)

This submission is probably too late for today=E2=80=99s interim, but =
feedback is requested!

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten

